Fifa president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football’s governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.
Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans.
The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters.
This has fuelled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.
“There is no additional revenue for Fifa, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance,” Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday. “So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter.”
The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature of the game.
England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break “interrupts and changes the identity of the football match”, while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.
Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.
“The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the World Cup, played over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.
“What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.
“It’s very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it’s hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity.”
Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.
