Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
Sport
Jon Seidel

Feds examining whether Wrigley Field renovations comply with Americans with Disabilities Act

Aerial photos of Wrigley Field with fresh sod taken Saturday, April 1, 2017. | Lee Hogan/For the Sun-Times

Federal authorities have begun an investigation to determine whether the Chicago Cubs’ years-long renovation of Wrigley Field complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act, court records show.

Though the Cubs’ attorneys say they “welcome” the investigation, they also say it will delay the installation of additional accessible seating ahead of the 2020 season.

Lawyers for the Cubs disclosed the investigation in a letter filed Thursday with U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso, who is presiding over a lawsuit brought by David Felimon Cerda, a Cubs fan with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who uses a wheelchair.

Cerda has alleged that as a result of the Cubs’ five-year renovation project at Wrigley, he can no longer sit in his preferred seats there, and his view of the games has gotten worse. He says the team has violated its duty under the ADA.

In the letter to Alonso, Minh N. Vu of the Seyfarth Shaw LLP law firm contended the renovation has actually “significantly increased the accessibility of the ballpark” and added that ADA compliance “is of critical importance to the Cubs.”

Vu explained that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago has begun “an ADA Title III compliance review of Wrigley Field and the recent renovations to ensure that Wrigley Field is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities and operated in compliance with the ADA.”

The lawyer told the judge “the review will overlap with some of the issues raised” in the Cerda case.

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office confirmed the accuracy of the letter.

Finally, the Cubs expected to add more accessible seating before the 2020 season, Vu wrote. The lawyer explained, “before making this substantial capital investment, however, the team believes it is prudent to place the project on hold and receive any feedback from the (U.S. Attorney’s Office) which might impact this seating.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.