Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
National
Jon Seidel

Federal judge sides against family of Chicago police officer who died in fellow officer’s home

Chicago Police Officer Ruby Falcon. | Facebook photo

A federal judge sided Wednesday against the family of a Chicago police officer who died of a gunshot wound in July 2016, ruling in a lawsuit that the officer’s off-duty death was “a terrible tragedy,” but evidence was insufficient that she had not committed suicide.

Ruby Falcon had joined Officer Danielle Deering and another colleague at two Chicago-area bars the night of July 29, 2016 — and into early July 30 — before Falcon and Deering went to Deering’s home to meet up with other co-workers, according to court records.

There, Deering sent her colleagues to the basement while she went to gather beers from the kitchen and make up a bed. While she was in the kitchen, Deering also put her off-duty weapon and holster on the kitchen counter, records show.

That’s when Falcon entered the room and purportedly asked Deering about the co-worker who had joined them at the bars. Deering insisted she was not in the home. Falcon told Deering not to lie, put Deering’s gun to her head and pulled the trigger, according to court records.

Falcon’s family wound up suing Deering for negligence and battery. The family also filed claims against the owners of the two bars — VPEN Inc., which owns 115 Bourbon Street in Merrionette Park, and Alsip Restaurant and Lounge Inc., which owns Bar 122 in Alsip.

U.S. District Judge Martha Pacold on Wednesday granted motions for summary judgment by Deering and the two bar owners, focusing primarily on the question of whether Falcon committed suicide. The judge wrote that there was not enough evidence to find otherwise, as the family had primarily only offered evidence “that Falcon was a generally happy person.”

That conclusion led Pacold to rule the negligence claims against Deering could not stand. Nor could the claims against the bar owners, which had been used under the Illinois Dram Shop Act.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.