Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Federal Judge Partially Pauses Trump Administration's Immigration Enforcement Policy

Donald Trump during speech.

A federal judge has issued a temporary order partially pausing the Trump administration's new policy that granted wider latitude for immigration enforcement at some churches and other houses of worship. This ruling marks the first legal consideration of the policy's legality.

The order, issued by US District Judge Theodore Chuang on Monday, represents a narrow victory for the religious organizations challenging the policy in court. Chuang's ruling blocks the administration from implementing the policy at the places of worship of the religious organizations involved in the lawsuit, which include congregations of Quakers, Baptists, and Sikhs. However, the judge did not halt the policy nationwide.

Multiple cases are currently challenging the Trump policy, with Chuang being the first to provide a legal opinion on its legality. He determined that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in their arguments that the policy violates the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Judge Theodore Chuang's ruling affects specific religious organizations involved in the lawsuit.
Federal judge issues temporary order pausing Trump policy on immigration enforcement at churches.
Policy challenged by congregations of Quakers, Baptists, and Sikhs.

As a result of Chuang's ruling, the administration must revert to the federal government's pre-Trump policy, which allowed for some immigration enforcement at churches but under more limited circumstances. In his 56-page opinion, Chuang emphasized that he was not questioning law enforcement's ability to conduct operations in or near places of worship when necessary.

He highlighted concerns about the lack of meaningful limitations or safeguards in the 2025 Policy regarding law enforcement activities in places of worship without warrants, suggesting that it may not meet constitutional and statutory requirements for the plaintiffs involved in the case.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.