Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
Politics
Ethan James

Experts defend no-stadium call ahead of crucial vote

The proposed stadium in Hobart hangs in the balance, with a decision due within days. (HANDOUT/TASMANIAN GOVERNMENT)

Planning experts who recommended Tasmania's proposed AFL stadium not go ahead have defended their report, saying criticism labelling it "opinion" was off the mark.

State parliament's upper house will on December 3 and 4 debate whether to give the green light to a $1.13 billion roofed waterfront venue in Hobart.

The stadium, backed by the governing Liberals and Labor opposition, but opposed by the Greens and some crossbenchers, is a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL and AFLW in 2028.

Bec Thomas (file image)
Bec Thomas is one of two independent upper house members who could decide the stadium's fate. (Ethan James/AAP PHOTOS)

The approval vote could swing on two upper house independents, Bec Thomas and Dean Harriss, who haven't publicly revealed their hand.

A panel of upper house MPs on Thursday quizzed the authors of a September state planning commission report which recommended the stadium not go ahead.

The commission said the stadium was too big for the site, its costs outweighed its benefits and it would add $1.8 billion in debt to the state budget over 10 years.

Premier Jeremy Rockliff said the report massively underestimated social and economic benefits, while the stadium developer described the commission's major issues as "opinion".

An anti-stadium rally (file image)
Anti-stadium protesters are pressuring the state government to abandon the project. (Ethan James/AAP PHOTOS)

Commission report author and lawyer Paul Turner said the recommendations were built on empirical evidence.

"We have sifted through the materials, we have considered the facts using our respective areas of expertise," he said.

"We have reached a conclusion which could be said to be opinions, but they are ones which are valid and which have weight."

The commission found the stadium's cost-benefit ratio was less than 0.5, meaning for every $1 spent less than a 50-cent direct benefit would be returned.

The cost-benefit analysis was conducted off information obtained via the government, Mr Turner said.

Tasmania Football Club CEO Brendon Gale
Tasmania Devils CEO Brendon Gale says the club has no future without the stadium. (Chris Kidd/AAP PHOTOS)

Architect and report author Shelley Penn said the stadium was assessed on its quality, including whether it was fit for purpose and on budget, rather than taste.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose government is chipping in $240 million to development at the site, on Thursday urged the upper house to vote for the stadium.

Tasmania Devils chief executive Brendon Gale has ramped up his pitch to the upper house, reiterating the team won't happen without the stadium.

"Centrally located, modern stadia with world-class accessibility and amenity aren't extravagances; they're essential community assets," he said in a presentation to MPs.

Thousands turned out at an anti-stadium protest on November 23, with a counter pro-stadium rally planned for Sunday.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.