Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
ABC News
ABC News
Business

Ex-wife of Ben Roberts-Smith accused of sharing his email password and accessing his account

Ben Roberts-Smith is suing ex-wife Emma Roberts over allegations she accessed an email account he used for confidential legal correspondence.

Telstra records suggest a close friend of Ben Roberts-Smith's ex-wife may have accessed the war veteran's email account more than 100 times, a Sydney court has heard.

The case Mr Roberts-Smith launched against Emma Roberts is running concurrently with his high-stakes defamation proceedings against three newspapers.

It was triggered when his defamation opponents issued a notice to produce specific documents, which his legal team suspects may have arisen from access to an email account he used for confidential legal correspondence.

Mr Roberts-Smith's lawyers have accused Ms Roberts of accessing the account and say they are concerned she may have passed on confidential information to third parties.

His barrister, Arthur Moses SC, today applied in the Federal Court to add Ms Roberts' best friend Danielle Scott and her husband as respondents in the case.

Mr Moses cited Telstra records which he claimed established that either Ms Scott or her husband accessed a "hosting account" of Ben Roberts-Smith's company, RS Group Australia.

He told the court the access occurred "on at least 101 occasions" between January 2020 and May 2021.

"The RS Group Australia email hosting account ... is password-protected and enables a person, once logged on, to access the email account of any RS Group user, including the applicant's," Mr Moses said.

Arthur Moses says Telstra records show the account was accessed at least 101 times. (AAP: James Gourley)

Mr Roberts-Smith has previously sworn in an affidavit that Ms Scott or her husband were never given the password.

Mr Moses said the Telstra evidence raised a series of new issues, including how the couple accessed the password, whether they accessed Mr Roberts-Smith's specific email account, and whether they passed on any confidential information to third parties.

Mr Moses said if Ms Scott and her husband were not added as respondents, there would be "a basis to commence separate proceedings against them".

Had his client been aware of the Telstra records earlier, he would have included the pair as respondents when the case began, Mr Moses said.

Justice Robert Bromwich reserved his decision.

Mr Roberts-Smith's defamation case, against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times, is on hold until at least November due to Sydney's COVID-19 outbreak.

He alleges he was defamed by reports that included allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying of colleagues and domestic violence upon a woman in a Canberra hotel room.

Ms Roberts will be a defence witness in the defamation trial.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.