Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Kenan Malik

Ethics and sport have long been strangers to one another

Bradley Wiggins was accused by MPs of crossing an ethical line.
Bradley Wiggins was accused by MPs of crossing an ethical line. Photograph: Pascal Pavani/AFP/Getty Images

‘We felt that Bolshevism had invaded our sanctuary.” So wrote the author AG Gardiner on visiting the Oval cricket ground in 1924. What had brought the world crashing down in south London? The Gentlemen and Players had come out together. Gentlemen in cricket were the amateurs, Players the professionals. They normally entered the field of play through different gates. Not this time.

The demarcation between amateur and professional was, for decades, one of the great ethical lines of sport. The American Jim Thorpe was stripped of two gold medals at the 1912 Olympic Games because he had once been paid $25 playing baseball. In rugby union, as late as 1981, two England internationals, Bill Beaumont and Fran Cotton, were banned for 10 years for receiving royalties from their autobiographies.

Today’s great ethical debate is not about payment but drugs. Last week, the digital, culture, media and sport select committee accused Bradley Wiggins of “crossing the ethical line” for allegedly misusing drugs allowed for medical purposes to enhance performance.

The ethical lines over drug use are, however, as arbitrary and irrational as earlier ones about payment. Drugs are said to be “unnatural” and to provide athletes with an “unfair advantage”. But virtually everything an athlete does, from high-altitude training to high-protein dieting, is unnatural and seeks to gain an advantage.

EPO is a naturally produced hormone that stimulates red blood cell production, so helping endurance athletes. Injections of EPO are banned in sport. Yet Chris Froome is permitted to sleep in a hypoxic chamber, which reduces oxygen in the air, forcing his body to produce more red blood cells. It has the same effect as EPO, is equally unnatural and provides an advantage. Why is one banned but not the other?

Ethics in sport are not really about ethics, but about establishing a sense of order and decorum and projecting a particular image of what is good or healthy. Perhaps today, too, we could do with a bit more Bolshevism on the playing field.

• Kenan Malik is an Observer columnist

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.