On Tuesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and economist Peter Schiff shared opposing views about President Donald Trump’s signature tax-and-spending package on social media.
Warren, Schiff Spar Over Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill
Warren criticized Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” in a post on X, arguing that its tax benefits overwhelmingly favor the wealthiest Americans while offering only modest relief to working families.
She alleged that a family earning $50,000 would receive “less than $2 a day” in tax cuts under the legislation, while households in the top 0.1% would get more than $300,000.
Calling the measure “legalized theft,” she wrote, “This is legalized theft from working people to reward the ultra-rich. We must not forget that.”
Because of the Big, Beautiful Bill: A family making $50K will get less than $2 a day from this bill's tax cuts—while a household in the top 0.1% will receive more than $300K
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) July 7, 2026
This is legalized theft from working people to reward the ultra-rich.
We must not forget that.
Read Also: Bernie Sanders Says Microsoft's Layoffs and Xbox Price Hike Show Tax Cuts 'It Never Trickles Down'
Schiff pushed back, rejecting Warren’s characterization of the bill.
“Letting people keep the money they earn is not theft,” Schiff wrote on X. “It’s taking their money and giving it to someone else that’s legalized theft.”
While defending tax cuts, Schiff argued the legislation failed to sufficiently reduce federal spending. He warned that larger budget deficits could ultimately fuel inflation, adding that “the resulting increase in deficit spending lead to theft by inflation.”
Letting people keep the money they earn is not theft. It's taking their money and giving it to someone else that's legalized theft. The problem with the BBB was its failure to cut government spending. The resulting increase in deficit spending lead to theft by inflation.
— Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) July 7, 2026
Democrats, Trump Administration Remain Deeply Divided
Warren’s comments echo broader Democratic criticism of the legislation.
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) has accused the bill of transferring wealth from lower-income Americans to the wealthy, while Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) argued Republicans financed tax breaks for high-income households by cutting healthcare and food assistance programs.
The Trump administration has defended the legislation as a catalyst for long-term economic growth.
Earlier this year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” would help drive a multi-year expansion, predicting a “non-inflationary boom” in 2026 fueled by stronger business investment, increased manufacturing activity and tax incentives designed to encourage capital spending.
He also pointed to improving GDP projections as evidence that economic momentum was accelerating.
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Photo courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald / Shutterstock.com
