Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics

Electroconvulsive therapy is overrated but not ‘hell’

ECT machine
‘No ECT patient recalls an electric shock and ECT was a humane improvement on the drug-induced convulsions of its original form.’ Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian

As a medical journalist who published several articles criticising the overuse of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and even questioned its superiority to sham ECT, I protest at your reference to “the hell of electroconvulsive therapy” (‘We exist upon the fringe of the world’: the queer American poets who battled madness and obscurity, 3 July). First, by the 1960s, ECT was usually done under general anaesthesia. As a trainee psychiatrist, I regularly administered both anaesthesia and ECT. Second, even without pre-ECT anaesthesia, any epileptic will confirm that a significant period of complete retrograde amnesia always accompanies a convulsion. No ECT patient recalls an electric shock and ECT was a humane improvement on the drug-induced convulsions of its original form. When antidepressant drugs fail, many patients improve after placebo ECT (anaesthesia only), but real ECT is significantly – though not vastly – superior. You should not needlessly deter severely depressed patients from accepting it.
Colin Brewer
London

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.