Anxious airline passengers assessing the conflicting pronouncements about the fate of the charter flight from Sharm el Sheikh to St Petersburg could find plenty of reasons not to step aboard a holiday jet any time soon.
The deputy director of the airline insisted that an “external influence” was responsible for sending the 224 passengers aboard the Airbus A321 to their deaths in the Sinai desert. The widow of the flight’s first officer said he had expressed concern about the aircraft’s mechanical condition. And the US director of national intelligence would not rule out terrorism as the cause of the crash.
The astute airline passenger in the UK, though, will carry on flying.
In the wake of Saturday’s disaster, I checked the record of Russian aviation over the past 20 years, and calculated an average of one fatal accident annually. In contrast, Britain’s airlines have not suffered a single fatal crash involving a passenger jet since the 1980s. While risk can never be entirely eliminated, the UK’s aviation community has the gold standard in air safety.
Understandably, the grieving relatives are demanding urgent answers as to why their loved ones died. Plenty of interested parties are coming forward to offer explanations. But there is only one assessment to which it is rational to pay heed: the report of the international team of trained investigators currently examining the evidence from a scene of human tragedy.
