Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Mirror
Daily Mirror
World
Mark Waghorn

Eating more fish could save the planet as scientists call for 'blue food revolution'

Eating more fish could save the planet, according to new research.

Scientists are calling for a 'blue food revolution' to beat climate change.

It involves doubling global consumption of aquatic produce.

Some is more nutritious than beef, lamb, goat, chicken or pork.

Fish farms out at sea would feed the world's growing population.

Plants and algae from freshwater and marine environments also boost diets.

The ambitious Blue Food Assessment (BFA) plan has been drawn up by an international team of more than 100 experts.

Co-chair Professor Beatrice Crona, of the Stockholm Resilience Centre, said: "Blue foods are much more diverse than typically thought.

"So too are the many communities of small-scale fishers often overlooked despite providing most blue food people eat."

CLICK HERE TO READ OUR INTERACTIVE FEATURE ON VANISHING UK

Grilled salmon with vegetables (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Levels of omega-3, vitamins A and B12, calcium, iodine, iron and zinc were assessed - from seaweed to salmon.

Co-chair Prof Rosamond Naylor, of Stanford University in California, said: "Few, if any, countries are developing their blue food sector to provide ecological, economic, and health benefits to its full potential.

"This assessment aims to provide the scientific foundation for decision-makers to evaluate trade-offs and implement solutions.

"They will make blue foods an instrumental part of an improved food system from local to global scales."

Do you agree? Have your say in the comment section

The database profiled 3,753 types of food including fish, crustaceans, and algae.

It found the top seven categories of nutrient-rich animal foods are aquatic - including tuna, herring, shellfish, salmon and trout.

A mathematical model showed an 8 percent increase in production by 2030 would slash prices by a quarter.

It would also improve the diets of up to 166 million people - with benefits three times greater for women in low income countries.

Greenhouse gas emissions and pollution would also drop dramatically. Seaweeds and farmed shellfish like clams and oysters performed best.

Compared to chicken, trout has approximately 19 times more omega-3 fatty acids.

Oysters and mussels have 76 times more vitamin B-12 and five times more iron. Carps have nine times more calcium.

On average, the major species produced in aquaculture such as salmon and carp had environmental footprints comparable to chicken - the lowest-impact land meat.

Scientists say eat more fish (Getty Images/EyeEm)

Get all the latest news straight to your inbox. Sign up to one of the Mirror's newsletters

Sardines, anchovies, shellfish and seaweeds all already offer lower stressors than chicken.

The research also found blue food systems facing the highest risk from climate change are typically located where people rely on them most - and are least equipped to cope.

More than 2,500 species or species groups of fish, shellfish, aquatic plants and algae are caught or cultivated globally for food.

They provide livelihoods and incomes for more than 100 million people - and sustenance for one billion.

The findings are in five papers published in the journals Nature, Nature Food and Nature Communications.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.