As the name already suggests, in EA FC 26 Ultimate Team, players gather promising hotshots from various leagues and regions to cook an ultimate squad that shows no mercy on the field. For this highly competitive approach, most players employ “meta” techniques for their team, which are often recommended by the big names in the community.
While these flashy strategies may influence the number of wins and competitive perfection, some players are eager to stick to their own preferences and ignore the typical tactical traditions. They require a fun squad, something that’s all about creativity and personal connection. With that in mind, we bring you an out-of-the-box Ultimate Team squad that ignores the current meta trends, while remaining productive.
What Is Meta In EA FC 26 Ultimate Team?
Meta isn’t a word but an abbreviation for Most Effective Tactics Available. It refers to a squad where skillful players are welcomed and arranged in the best formations, such as 4-4-2 or 4-2-3-1, to excel in dribbling and shooting, along with robust on-field pace. On paper, it sounds simple, but the majority of the player base either follows the experts here or invests countless hours to come up with an effective technique.
All of these lineups are designed to exploit the game’s limitations to have an edge over the competition. The use of smart meta, paired with promising skills, can even guarantee wins, but at the end of the day, you are just following a similar path as thousands, if not millions, of EA FC 26 players. To extract more enjoyment from the game, sometimes ignoring the meta is necessary.
Why Is Chemistry Important?
Before we dive into our fun squad, it’s crucial to understand how the chemistry system in EA FC 26 behaves. In FUT, achieving a complete 33/33 chemistry is a big thing as it directly influences major player attributes.
While this achievement is essential in meta, here we require it the most, as we’ll already be a little behind without effective tactics. In order to compensate, building a creative squad with chemistry maximizes its potential.
Building A Fun Squad In EA FC 26
With the role of chemistry discussed, here’s our fun squad build, including positions, names, ratings, and prices.
| Position | Player Name | Overall Rating | Price (Coins) |
| LW | Kylian Mbappe | 91 | 2,677,000 |
| ST | Erling Haaland | 90 | 111,000 |
| RW | Lamine Yamal | 89 | 277,000 |
| CM | Toni Kroos | 90 | 540,000 |
| CM | Jude Bellingham | 90 | 134,000 |
| CM | Xavi | 91 | 825,000 |
| LB | Marcelo | 89 | 960,000 |
| CB | Virgil van Dijk | 90 | 145,000 |
| GK | Thibaut Courtios | 89 | 60,000 |
| CB | Carles Puyol | 89 | 248,000 |
| RB | Federico Valverde | 89 | 380,000 |
- Formation: 4-3-3
- Total Chemistry: 31/33
- Overall Rating: 90
- Total Price on PlayStation and Xbox: 6,357,000 coins
As you can see, by ignoring meta and welcoming legends such as Xavi, Kroos, and Mbappe, we are still able to reach a whopping 90 overall squad rating and an excellent chemistry level of 31/33. This is because every athlete here is a unique individual and holds a dream status for many.
Speaking of dream status, all the stars here come with a significant price tag, costing you around 6.3 million coins, which excludes them from a budget Ultimate Team. Since you are adding athletes from famous leagues such as La Liga, the Premier League, and the Bundesliga, your coins are going exactly where they should.
Performance-wise, the team maintains a balance between solid wide attackers and thoughtful midfield passing. Here, Xavi and Kroos will advance the ball on the field skillfully thanks to their clever positioning and precise passing. Bellingham, on the other hand, will add to it with his dynamic play, connecting attack and defense. Overall, the big three at the front will combine to increase scoring opportunities.
That said, here’s how you can ignore the meta and reconnect with EA FC 26 Ultimate Team refreshingly. Whether nostalgic, thematic, or experimental, this squad delivers the finest players ideal for providing competitive and creative gameplay without relying on typical methods.
