Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Technology
Letters

Driverless cars prompt pile-up of questions

Baidu driverless cars on a test run in Jiaxing, China
Baidu driverless cars on a test run in Jiaxing, China. ‘If there is an accident, who will be legally to blame?’ asks Jim Kelly. Photograph: VCG via Getty Images

As a London taxi driver on the front line of the impact of driverless cars, I found Jackie Ashley’s article (Driverless cars should be a major political issue, 2 January) long overdue. Many of the questions she raises are worrying.

The idea that faceless corporations such as Uber are developing this technology to give it away for the greater good of mankind and the environment is questionable. Once these non-national monopolies take control, they will have the power to set the price for the job, and my bet is it will not be as cheap as Jackie predicts. Just check out the companies and individuals who have bought shares in these tech platforms, there’s hardly an idealist among them.

Volkswagen and Ford are not investing in joint ventures with Uber etc to sell fewer cars. They are in the game to increase production.

As for driverless cars increasing the safety of vulnerable members of the travelling public, this is unproven – a car’s computer could be hacked, causing safety issues. If there is an accident, who will be legally to blame? If Uber doesn’t pay its taxes in the UK, would it be bound by UK law in a road traffic accident caused by an algorithm emanating anywhere on the planet?

I am sure most London cab drivers would be willing to discuss this further with Jackie for the cost of a metered and regulated cab fare from York Way.
Jim Kelly
Chair, Unite London & Eastern Cab Section

• I hope Jimmy Wales (G2, 3 January) and Jackie Ashley are right about the benevolent effects of driverless cars. We will have to ensure that ownership, distribution and use are organised socially rather than by corporate monopolies, which will have no interest in passing on reduced costs; so Wikipedia, not Google. We may also need to take over the manufacturers since they are unlikely to go along with an 80% reduction in production. And we will have to engineer a major shift in social attitudes to ownership if collective benefits are not to be trumped by the premium attached to private convenience and status.
Richard Middleton
Castle Douglas, Scotland

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.