Welcome to Documenting America’s Path to Recovery, where we track the status of reopening in all 50 states. Today we look at an agreement between Washington, Oregon, and California to test new coronavirus technology developed by Apple and Google, the loosening of restrictions in Texas, a lawsuit involving COVID-19 restrictions in New York, and more. Want to know what happened yesterday? Click here.
Since our last editionWhat is open in each state? For a continually updated article on reopening status in all 50 states, click here.
Daily feature: Featured lawsuitOnce a week, we take a closer look at a noteworthy lawsuit involving governmental responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States. We define a noteworthy lawsuit as one that has garnered significant media attention, involves major advocacy groups, or deals with unique legal questions. This week, we look at a lawsuit involving COVID-19 restrictions in New York. The Cloister East, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityOn Sept. 11, Judge Arthur F. Engoron of the New York County Supreme Court granted a temporary restraining order against the New York State Liquor Authority (SLA), allowing an East Village cafe to reopen. What is at issue? The Cloister Cafe was shut down in August after authorities alleged it had hosted secretive late-night parties in violation of COVID-19 restrictions. The cafe challenged the shut-down in federal court, but Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the cafe a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The cafe then initiated an Article 78 proceeding in state court. Article 78 proceedings are used to appeal the decision of a New York state or local agency to state court. In its complaint, the cafe argued that SLA had deprived it of its liquor license in violation of state law and its constitutional rights. The cafe alleged the license revocation was done without notice, “or any pre-suspension opportunity to be heard,” in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of procedural due process. How did the court rule? In his order, Engoron did not specify why he granted the temporary restraining order. He did say that “any credible evidence of a significant future infraction [on the part of the cafe] will result in immediate reinstatement of the suspension.” What are the reactions, and what comes next? Robert Garson, an attorney for the cafe, said it “may provide a light at the end of the tunnel for all of those restaurant and beverage workers who have also had their licenses summarily and unconstitutionally stripped from them.” In a statement to the press, the SLA said it “will continue to vigorously defend the state’s actions and remain laser focused on protecting New Yorkers during this pandemic.” A full hearing on the merits is scheduled for Oct. 5. |
Additional activityIn this section, we feature examples of other federal, state, and local government activity, private industry responses, and lawsuits related to the pandemic.
|
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
One app.
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles. One news app.
Documenting America’s Path to Recovery: September 17, 2020
Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member?
Sign in here
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Our Picks