A month or so ago, a friend casually mentioned that they thought red kites were starting to nest near their house. Very near, in fact; actually in the garden. Even in the hills beyond Tregaron, where kites wheel and dive in such abundance as to be almost unworthy of comment, having a nest within view of your kitchen window is unusual.
On the boundary of the property, the crook of a sycamore tree provided an apparently suitable spot for the pair to set up home; occasional bulletins told of the progress, albeit slow and halting, of nest building. It seemed the birds were in no great hurry – limiting their activity to the odd twig or two each day – but eventually they had assembled a slightly ramshackle structure that managed to support the weight of a sitting bird.
I was looking forward to taking up the invitation to drop in for tea and have a look for myself. Then the anxiety began. These are “schedule 1” birds under the 1981 Wildlife & Countryside Act, meaning that a red kite has year-round protection against disturbance, especially “while it is building a nest or is in, on or near a nest containing eggs or young”. Could the arrival of an extra person at a quiet rural dwelling constitute “disturbance”? When I caught myself looking at adverts for telephoto lenses I realised I was on uncertain moral ground, and decided not to take up the offer.
The most recent news was disappointing. The red kites had abandoned the nest – and, more worryingly, one of the pair was no longer visible in the area. Hopefully, this had just been a test-run by newly paired youngsters and they will return next year for another attempt; but I was left with the shadow of how I would feel if the birds had left after I had been to visit.
Not without regret, I’ve concluded that the only sensible place to watch these magnificent birds is where they are truly free to roam.
Follow Country diary on Twitter: @gdncountrydiary