Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Bangkok Post
Bangkok Post
Comment

Disappearing justice

This week the world marks the International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances which falls on Aug 30.

Despite the Thai government's countless promises, enforced disappearance -- the heinous practice by which government officials take someone into custody but deny doing so -- is still not a crime in Thailand. Those who were disappeared, as well as their families, have yet to see justice.

Since 1980, the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances has recorded 82 cases of enforced disappearance in Thailand, including prominent Muslim lawyer Somchai Neelapaijit in March 2004 and ethnic Karen activist Porlajee "Billy" Rakchongcharoen in April 2014. The actual number could be higher, as some families of victims and witnesses remain silent, fearing reprisals if they speak.

For decades, successive Thai governments have failed to conduct credible investigations into enforced disappearance allegations. Somchai's case is the only one ever brought to court. But because Thailand's penal code does not recognise enforced disappearance as a crime, prosecutors instead filed charges of robbery and coercion against five police officers allegedly involved in Somchai's abduction. The trial, hampered by cover-ups and shoddy investigations, ended in December 2015 when the Supreme Court acquitted all five suspects.

During the UN Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in May 2016, the Thai government pledged to take steps to ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, which Thailand signed in 2012, and enact the necessary domestic legislation.

But despite those pledges, the Thai government continues to engage in practices that create conditions conducive to enforced disappearance -- such as the use of secret detention by anti-narcotics units and secret military detention of political dissenters, suspects in national security cases, and suspected insurgents in the southern border provinces.

Hope is fading further after the government of Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-ocha sent a draft law criminalising enforced disappearances and torture back to the drawing board, without a clear timeframe for revision. And ratification of the convention still has yet to be finalised.

Meanwhile, the much-talked-about Committee to Receive Complaints and Investigate Allegations of Torture and Enforced Disappearance is just an administrative body with little authority or political will to seriously act in cases. It falls far short of what can be considered as an adequate substitute for a legislation.

There is no excuse for the Thai government's failure to follow through on its pledges. The families of Thailand's "disappeared" need to know that their government is doing all it can to end this abhorrent practice and bring those responsible to justice.

Sunai Phasuk
Human Rights Watch


Fascism of the Left

Re: "Why fascism can happen in America", (Opinion, Aug 29).

By trying to conflate Republicans with proto-fascists or white nationalists, Paul Krugman aims at criminalising one of the two political parties in America, and its supporters. That would leave us with, yes, a one-party state. This has already happened in American colleges where leftist liberals already have near-total hegemony and freedom of speech is curtailed by violence.

Now, reducing the power of government is a typical conservative or libertarian move, in the opposite direction of fascism. In what direction does increasing the power of government move? In a direction opposite to the opposite direction of fascism.

Secondly, opposing activist judges who turn their opinion into law instead of trusting the legislative and constitutional amendment process (a rather undemocratic development), is also typically a conservative or libertarian move and arguably in the democratic and constitutional tradition of the country. Meanwhile, racial resentment (identity politics) is basically the main platform of the Democrats.

Anyway, why pay attention to someone who takes a joke of a friend seriously as opposed to studying history? Stating that the true historical path of Eastern Europe is fascism is patently insane. Good enough for The New York Times!

Baffled Reader


Contact: Bangkok Post Building
136 Na Ranong Road Klong Toey, Bangkok 10110
fax: +02 6164000 Email:
postbag@bangkokpost.co.th

All letter writers must provide full name and address.

All published correspondence is subject to editing at our discretion.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.