On July 7, education minister Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank announced on Twitter that the CBSE would revise its syllabus for the senior secondary classes keeping in mind the “extraordinary situation” of the coronavirus pandemic.
Looking at the extraordinary situation prevailing in the country and the world, #CBSE was advised to revise the curriculum and reduce course load for the students of Class 9th to 12th. @PMOIndia @HMOIndia @PIB_India @MIB_India @DDNewslive @cbseindia29 @mygovindia
— Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (@DrRPNishank) July 7, 2020
The CBSE axed chapters on secularism, democractic rights, federalism, gender, religion and caste from the syllabus. The chapter on demonetisation was removed from class 12 business studies books. The decision drew flak from various stakeholders. The government was criticised for removing these chapters and opposition parties denounced the move as being part of a “bigger conspiracy”.
Sitaram Yechury, of the CPIM, termed the decision atrocious. “Using the pandemic, the Modi government is deleting sections dealing with India's diversity, plurality, democracy etc that uphold our Constitutional values,” he tweeted.
1/3 I was going to congratulate @DrRPNishank on reducing the CBSE students' course-load, till i saw what they're deleting: https://t.co/DQKboUeJ6k
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) July 8, 2020
So children of Std.X will no longer learn about 'democracy &diversity', 'gender, religion &caste', 'popular struggles& movements'...
Shocked to know that the Central Govt has dropped topics like Citizenship, Federalism, Secularism & Partition in the name of reducing CBSE course during #COVIDCrisis.
— Mamata Banerjee (@MamataOfficial) July 8, 2020
We strongly object to this & appeal @HRDMinistry, GoI to ensure these vital lessons aren't curtailed at any cost. https://t.co/pkBaVI4VKM
Responding to the criticism, the CBSE claimed the dropped topics would be covered in the rationalised syllabus or in the alternative academic calendar-- a calendar designed specifically to aid learning in the pandemic. In a circular released on July 8, it said, “Schools have been directed to follow the Alternative Academic Calendar prepared by NCERT for transacting the curriculum. Therefore, each of the topics that has been wrongly mentioned in the media as deleted has been covered under Alternative Academic Calendar of NCERT, which is already on force for all the affiliated schools of Board.”
Rationalization of syllabus up to 30% undertaken for nearly 190 subjects of class 9th to 12th for academic purposes for session 2020-21 as a one time measure only: CBSE on reports of it leaving out topics such as federalism, nationalism & secularism from Class 11 books pic.twitter.com/qsTGVs5WRY
— ANI (@ANI) July 8, 2020
However, in his same tweet thread on July 7, Pokhriyal mentioned that he had sought suggestions from academics on reducing the syllabus and received over 1,500 of them.
To aid the decision, a few weeks back I also invited suggestions from all educationists on the reduction of #SyllabusForStudents2020 and I am glad to share that we received more than 1.5K suggestions. Thank you, everyone, for the overwhelming response.@PIB_India@MIB_India
— Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (@DrRPNishank) July 7, 2020
On August 20, Lakhan Singh, a lawyer and RTI activist who is associated with the People’s Action Justice For All, filed an RTI application with the higher education department of Pokhriyal’s ministry, seeking the following:
1) Certified copy of the meeting resolution or minutes where it was decided to invite suggestions from all educationalists.
2) Certified copy of the invitation letter which was sent to all educationists to invite suggestions.
3) The medium (newspaper, news channel, etc) which was used to inform/ask/request all educationists to provide suggestions regarding syllabus reduction.
4) A documentary proof of the invitation or request from all educationists to give suggestions regarding syllabus reduction.
The higher education department transferred the application to the school education and literacy department.
On August 24, the application was transferred once again, this time to the National Council of Educational Research and Training.
The NCERT replied to Singh on August 28, claiming it did not possess the information sought by him.
The transfer of the RTI application and the response to it beg the question: were educationists actually consulted about the deletion of chapters from the CBSE syllabus? If they were, why does the NCERT not have information about this? The only other possible explanation is that the ministry and the NCERT have deliberately withheld information, in violation of the RTI Act.
UPDATE: The story has been modified to make it clearer what the response to the RTI application indicates.
The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free. Support independent media by subscribing to Newslaundry today.
Also Read: Inside the online cult of #JusticeforSSR
Newslaundry is a reader-supported, ad-free, independent news outlet based out of New Delhi. Support their journalism, here.
