Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
We Got This Covered
We Got This Covered
Jaymie Vaz

‘Did he violate his oath again?’: Pete Hegseth tries to tear down Sen Kelly, but Kelly gets the last laugh

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth just took aim at Senator Mark Kelly, again, this time over comments the latter made during CBS’s Face the Nation. According to The Hill, Hegseth accused Kelly of sharing classified information. The controversy centered on a discussion regarding the current state of the United States weapons stockpiles, which Kelly noted have been heavily depleted due to the ongoing war with Iran. 

Hegseth, who is a retired Major, struck out at the Arizona senator on X, by initially taking a shot at his retirement rank. “‘Captain’ Mark Kelly strikes again,” Hegseth wrote in response to a post by “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan. “Now he’s blabbing on TV (falsely & dumbly) about a CLASSIFIED Pentagon briefing he received. Did he violate his oath…again?” Hegseth further stated that the Pentagon’s legal counsel would be reviewing the lawmaker’s remarks.

Kelly didn’t let the accusation stand for long. Later that same evening, he responded to Hegseth by sharing a video clip from an April 30 hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. “We had this conversation in a public hearing a week ago and you said it would take ‘years’ to replenish some of these stockpiles,” Kelly wrote in his retort. “That’s not classified, it’s a quote from you.”

Check and mate, Hegseth

The clip in Kelly’s post features a moment where he asked Hegseth, during the hearing, about the time frame for replenishing military stockpiles. During that public testimony, Hegseth himself acknowledged that the timeline for replenishment would take “months and years.”

During the CBS interview, Kelly had discussed specific munitions like Tomahawks, ATACMS, SM-3, THAAD rounds, and Patriot rounds. He expressed concerns about how deeply the military has gone into these resources. 

“And the numbers are, I think it’s fair to say it’s shocking how deep we have gone into these magazines, because this president got our country into this without a strategic goal, without a plan, without a timeline, and because of that, we’ve expended a lot of munitions,” Kelly said. When asked about the timeline for replenishment, the senator noted that it would take years.

This public spat is only the most recent chapter in a long-standing public and legal battle between the two. The Hill has previously detailed how the Pentagon attempted to censure Kelly and reduce his retirement rank. 

This happened when Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds urged service members to refuse illegal orders. While the Pentagon sought to punish the senator for his speech, a federal judge blocked these actions in February.

In that ruling, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon asserted that the government had trampled on the senator’s First Amendment rights. The judge wrote, “This Court has all it needs to conclude that Defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees.” The judge also noted that retired veterans deserve respect from their government.

Hegseth has remained firm in his stance against the senator, previously writing on X that the court’s ruling would be “immediately appealed,” while referring to the senator’s actions as sedition. “Sedition is sedition, ‘Captain,’” Hegseth wrote.

For his part, Kelly has framed the legal battle as a defense of constitutional rights. “I didn’t ask for this fight, but I have been defending the Constitution since I was commissioned as an Ensign in the U.S. Navy.” 

Talking after that court decision, he also said: “After decades of public service, I can’t think of anything more important I can do for my country than defending the free speech rights of millions of retired veterans and all Americans.”

The legal proceedings have highlighted a deep divide regarding the rights of retired military personnel. While the Department of Justice argued that the speech of veterans should be more limited to preserve military discipline, Judge Leon found no precedent for extending active-duty speech restrictions to those who have retired. 

As this latest exchange on X proves, the relationship between the Pentagon and the Arizona senator remains as volatile as ever. Hegseth did call for an investigation, so this saga will continue one way or another. 

Personally, I am waiting to see how Hegseth will react when he realizes that Kelly was simply quoting his very public testimony. After all, he was on that struggle bus when a Democrat quoted him during the same Senate Armed Services hearing.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.