NEW DELHI: The debate on Monday on the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023, popularly known as Delhi services bill, witnessed several points of order being moved by the members, especially those belonging to the opposition benches.
The members of the treasury and opposition benches also exchanged barbs on a number of occasions, leading to occasional noisy scenes.
When home minister Amit Shah, who had moved the bill, was replying to it, he said a “sheesh mahal” was being built in Delhi. This was objected to by TMC’s Derek O’Brien. However, his objection was overruled by chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar.
Similarly, Shah alleged that the Congress, which has been the greatest sufferer of AAP politics, is sitting in that party’s “lap”. The Congress leaders, including Shaktisinh Gohil, raised an objection over the usage of the “lap”. This too was overruled by the chairperson.
During the debate on the bill, BJP MP Anil Jain alleged the AAP government in Delhi had indulged in corrupt practices and half-a-dozen party leaders have even been jailed and the present chief minister is their leader.
Taking strong objection to the remark, CPM member V Sivadasan raised a point under Rule 238, claiming that Jain has made a derogatory statement against the chief minister and taken his name also.
AAP member Sandeep Kumar Pathak also raised a similar point of order under the same rule, saying there cannot be allegations against the chief minister and former deputy chief minister as the matter is sub-judice.
AAP MP Raghav Chadha raised a point of order under Rule 110, saying a member should not deviate from the subject and should speak on the bill.
Dhankhar asked Pathak to provide details about the matters which are sub-judice.
CPI member John Brittas also raised a point of order under Rule 240 against the statement made by Jain and said there cannot be persistently irrelevant discussion and tedious argument.
Later, RJD member Manoj Jha raised a point of order when BJP member Surendra Singh Nagar levelled allegations against the Delhi government and AAP leaders.
Nagar also said that half-a-dozen of AAP leaders have been jailed. He described the Delhi chief minister as a person who does not keep his word.
Stressing the need for the bill, he said Shah helped the people of Delhi by sending all relief materials like oxygen cylinders and supplies during Covid.
Participating in the debate, Derek O'Brien asked, "Why a child of democracy (Prime Minister Narendra Modi) would mutilate democracy."
"Why would he (prime minister) ensure that one-third of the bills passed in Parliament in the last three years would be anti-federal," he posed.
O'Brien also asked about how many delegations the Union Government have been sent to states like Assam where crime against women is the highest.
Intervening, Dhankhar cautioned the TMC MP to keep his speech focused on the bill and also expunged some other remarks by him against the prime minister and some other ministers.
When O'Brien raised issues related to corruption, the treasury benches opposed it. He also said the prime minister should have been present during the discussion on the bill.
Dhankhar called BJP member Kavita Patidar to participate in the debate. But O'Brien continued with his speech which perturbed the chairman and forced him to take the name of the TMC leader.
He accused the TMC MP of disrupting the debate in the House.
Participating in the debate, Patidar supported the bill and reminded the opposition of the Emergency period.
Earlier, JMM member Mahua Maji and Congress MP Ajit Kumar Bhuyan opposed the bill, describing it as undemocratic and against the federal structure of the country. RJD MP A D Singh opposed the bill.
(With agency inputs)
