Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Michael McGowan

Defamation trial hears ‘malicious’ text message Pauline Hanson sent former senator’s wife

Brian Burston
Former One Nation senator Brian Burston is suing Pauline Hanson for defamation. Photograph: Flavio Brancaleone/AAP

Pauline Hanson sent a “spiteful” and “malicious” text message to the wife of former One Nation senator Brian Burston claiming that he considered her to be an “old bag” and was “infatuated” with one of his staff members, a court has heard.

A defamation trial brought by Burston against Hanson began in the federal court on Monday over a series of what he argues are allegations of sexual harassment made against him on social media, in interviews and in a text to his wife, Rosalyn.

In the text, sent in February 2019, Hanson claimed Burston, a One Nation senator from 2016 until 2018 when he sensationally quit the party, was being “investigated for sexual harassment” against one of his former staffers, and was “infatuated” with another.

“You won’t get to see the evidence [it’s] all on text from him to her because it will be a closed decision and she will get her pay out and [be] gagged,” Hanson wrote in the text.

“They can’t all be wrong.”

In the same message, Hanson also made what Burston’s barrister, Bruce McClintock SC, described as “intrinsically malicious”, “mean and spiteful” comments about what she claimed were the former senator’s feelings about his wife.

“He considers you to be nothing but a winging (sic) old bag turning out to be just like your mother who he wants to drop dead,” she wrote.

“He tells his staff he owns your home. Wake up to him. I have nothing to gain. I just believe you deserve to be treated with a bit more respect.”

The text, which was read out in court on Monday, was sent just days after an altercation in parliament between Burston and Hanson’s chief of staff, James Ashby, which led to the latter having his parliamentary pass temporarily revoked.

It followed Burston’s decision to quit One Nation in 2018 over what he described in court as “harassment” after his decision to support the Turnbull government’s corporate tax cuts.

“Harassing and generally treating me badly,” Burston said on Monday.

“It made me uncomfortable and my position became untenable.”

Burston subsequently joined Clive Palmer’s United Australia party, and left the senate in 2019.

On Monday he told the court the text message was “an attempt to destroy my marriage.”

The court also heard that in the months after his decision to quit the party, Ashby sent Burston texts in which he allegedly called the former senator an “idiot traitorous cunt”, a “coward” and an “old man”.

Although Ashby is not a party to the case, he is expected to give evidence at the trial. On Monday Burston was questioned by his barrister, Bruce McClintock, about a highly publicised “confrontation” between the two men following a Minerals Council dinner at parliament house the day before Hanson sent her text message.

Burston told the court that he attended the event, which included a keynote speech from then prime minister Scott Morrison, with his wife. They were seated at the same table as Ashby, which he was “very surprised” by.

After he left the event, Burston said Ashby approached him and his wife.

“Ashby said to me ‘what do you think of the sexual harassment charges?’ and I said get the phone out of my face,” he told the court.

“He kept asking me the same questions [and was] laughing and goading me as well.”

The confrontation continued until Burston said he pushed Ashby who he claimed “took a swing” at him, which, he said, glanced past his ear.

He said that at some point during the confrontation he sustained a cut to his hand, and admitted to wiping blood on Hanson’s parliament door, though he claimed he had “no memory” of the event until he saw it on CCTV later.

“I was traumatised,” he said. “He [Ashby] was very aggressive.”

Hanson is defending the case arguing the sexual harassment claims are substantially true, arguing Burston made a series of inappropriate comments towards female staff members.

In her defence, Hanson alleges Burston told a staff member that she needed a “good fuck” and offered to come to her house promising “the best fuck you ever had”.

He allegedly said separately of the same staff members that she was “getting a bit old” and “not as attractive as I thought she was”.

The alleged comments about the staffer made her feel “objectified and distressed” and led to her seeking counselling, Hanson’s defence states.

In the witness box on Monday, Burston denied the allegations.

“It’s false,” he said.

“It doesn’t make me too comfortable, it’s making me out to be a pervert in effect.”

Two of Burston’s former staffers are expected to give evidence during the trial.

McClintock said his client would argue that the sexual harassment allegations were “entirely fabricated” and that the events claimed by Hanson “never happened”.

Instead, he argued the two women made the allegations after Burston fired them for, among other things, getting drunk at a charity concert in Tamworth, and, in one case, suspicions of a sexual relationship with another former One Nation senator, Peter Georgiou, something Burston considered to be a conflict of interest after he fell out with the party.

McClintock took Burston through a series of allegations made by Hanson, including that the former senator made numerous inappropriate comments about staff. He was asked whether, on separate occasions, he attempted to kiss a staff worker, asked her if she had breast implants, and told her she had “sexy legs”.

Burston denied those claims.

In the same text sent by Hanson to Burston’s wife in 2019, the One Nation founder also denied she had ever “hit on” Burston, after the senator accused her of making unwanted advances towards him.

“I am definitely not attracted to him now or ever,” she wrote, claiming that he was “vindictive”.

“This is the man who said he would never hurt me or try to destroy One Nation. He turned on me because I couldn’t endorse him for another 6 years.

“I am sorry that was a political decision because he never worked enough to keep it. You may think differently but please be objective.”

The hearing continues.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.