For many retirees, the decision of when to start Social Security is one of the most important financial choices they’ll ever make. While it’s tempting to claim benefits as soon as you’re eligible, delaying Social Security by 1 year can have a surprisingly big impact on your retirement income — in some cases, leading to as much as a 76% increase by age 70. That’s money you can count on for the rest of your life. More retirees are catching on to this strategy, and the numbers suggest it’s not just a niche move anymore. Here’s what you should know if you’re weighing the pros and cons.
Understanding the Impact of Delaying
When you’re looking at delaying Social Security by 1 year, you’re essentially giving your benefit amount time to grow. Every year you wait past your full retirement age (FRA) adds about 8% to your payments, thanks to delayed retirement credits. If you start later and combine it with a higher initial earnings record, that growth compounds over time. For someone who waits until 70, the difference compared to claiming at 62 can be massive. This strategy isn’t for everyone, but for those who can afford to wait, the payoff is worth serious consideration.
How the 76% Increase Works
The idea of delaying Social Security by 1 year and ending up with a 76% uplift by 70 can sound too good to be true, but it’s based on clear math. Claiming at 62 locks in a smaller monthly benefit, while waiting until 70 maximizes your payout. Over those years, your benefits increase steadily, and when combined with cost-of-living adjustments, the total gain is substantial. For those who can bridge the income gap in the meantime, the extra funds at 70 can be life-changing. This is why more retirees are taking a second look before filing early.
The Growing Trend of Waiting
Not long ago, claiming benefits as early as possible was the norm, but now delaying Social Security by 1 year or more is becoming common. Many retirees are more informed about how waiting affects their financial security, and financial advisors often recommend it for those in good health. Longer lifespans also mean that the higher monthly benefit will be collected over more years, increasing the total payout. The trend reflects a shift in retirement planning toward maximizing income later in life. It’s a strategic move that balances short-term sacrifice with long-term stability.
Weighing the Risks of Waiting
While delaying Social Security by 1 year can boost your monthly check, it’s not without risk. The main concern is health — if you have a shorter life expectancy, you might not live long enough to fully benefit from waiting. Another factor is income needs; if you need the money sooner to cover expenses, delaying might not be practical. There’s also the opportunity cost of not having that income invested or used earlier. This decision should always be made in the context of your overall retirement plan and personal circumstances.
Using Other Income Sources to Delay
One way retirees make delaying Social Security by 1 year possible is by leaning on other income sources in the meantime. This could include part-time work, withdrawals from retirement accounts, or even using savings to bridge the gap. Some use rental income or investment returns to cover their needs while waiting for their benefits to grow. Strategic use of these funds can make it easier to delay without sacrificing quality of life. The key is careful budgeting and understanding how each income source fits into your retirement picture.
Considering Spousal Benefits in the Decision
Delaying Social Security by 1 year can have ripple effects if you’re married. A higher benefit for one spouse can also increase survivor benefits, offering long-term security for the other. Couples can coordinate their claiming strategies so one spouse files earlier while the other delays, balancing immediate needs with future gains. This coordinated approach can be especially valuable if one spouse earns significantly more than the other. It’s a reminder that the best strategy often considers both partners’ needs.
Why More Retirees Are Choosing This Path
The rise in retirees delaying Social Security by 1 year or more comes down to better education and access to planning tools. People are more aware of how this choice can significantly increase their lifetime income. In an era where pensions are rare and healthcare costs are rising, maximizing guaranteed income has strong appeal. The shift also reflects a broader understanding of longevity risk — the possibility of outliving your savings. For many, this strategy is less about getting more money now and more about securing the future.
Thinking Beyond the First Year Delay
Even if you can’t delay until age 70, delaying Social Security by 1 year can still make a meaningful difference. Every year of delay increases your monthly benefit and can improve your long-term financial stability. It’s not an all-or-nothing choice; partial delays can still have a positive impact. Weighing the options with a financial professional can help you determine what’s realistic for your situation. The important thing is understanding that even a single year of patience can pay off.
Patience Now, Rewards Later
The idea of delaying Social Security by 1 year may not sound exciting when bills are due, but the payoff in retirement can be substantial. By making strategic choices now, you can create a stronger financial foundation for your later years. It’s about trading a small delay for lasting benefits that can support you — and potentially your spouse — for decades. As more retirees discover this strategy, it’s becoming a cornerstone of modern retirement planning.
Would you consider delaying your Social Security claim to boost your benefits, or is taking it early the better choice for you? Share your thoughts below.
Read More:
Is Your Social Security About to Shrink Unless Congress Act Fast?
Is Your Social Security Spousal Benefit Getting Slashed Without You Realizing?
The post Could Delaying Social Security by 1 Year Mean a 76% Benefit Uplift at 70? More Do It Than You Think appeared first on The Free Financial Advisor.
