Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Nadeem Badshah

Constance Marten trial jury shown video of fugitive couple’s arrest

The jury in the trial of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon have been shown footage of the pair’s arrest with police asking repeatedly: “Where is your child?”

The defendants, of no fixed address, deny the manslaughter of their baby daughter, Victoria, by gross negligence between 4 January and 27 February last year.

They are also charged with perverting the course of justice, concealing the birth of a child, child cruelty and causing or allowing the death of a child.

They had allegedly been living with their newborn off-grid in a tent on the South Downs while on the run from police.

Greater Manchester police launched a missing persons inquiry in January 2023 after finding a placenta in the couple’s burnt-out car on a motorway near Bolton.

Police tracked them down to the Hollingbury area of Brighton last February after they were spotted by a member of the public who called 999.

Neither defendant gave any clue about the location or welfare of their baby as they were taken into custody, the Old Bailey was told.

Days later, on 1 March, Victoria’s body was found in a Lidl supermarket bag covered in rubbish in a disused shed.

On Tuesday, jurors watched body-worn video of the defendants’ arrests in which Marten refused to answer officers’ questions and called out to her “daddy bear”, telling her co-defendant: “I love you, baby.”

Gordon was also asked repeatedly where the child was and responded by demanding food and drink.

PC Matthew Colburn told jurors that he offered ginger beer, chicken and crisps from Gordon’s shopping bag.

When Gordon asked for mayonnaise to go with his chicken, the officer replied: “We are not going to make you a sandwich. We need to work out where your child is, mate.”

During the questioning about the whereabouts of the missing child, he responded: “What’s the big deal?”

PC Colburn replied: “What’s the big deal? We need to find your child, mate.”

The officer added: “The No 1 priority is your child. It might not be your priority, but it is everyone else’s priority.”

PC Colburn asked if the child was dead and Gordon, who was eating off the ground, replied: “The crisps are really good.”

The officer added: “I need to know where the baby is because I’m worried if we don’t find your child, your child might die, and that’s the most important thing right here, right now.”

PC Colburn told jurors he had never given a suspect food after arresting them before.

He added: “I quickly came to the realisation they had potentially not eaten for days, weeks or even months, and from my perspective it was the humane thing to do.”

Sgt Robert Button said Marten appeared to be wearing “furniture stuffing” for insulation and smelled “unclean and unwashed”.

On his body-worn video, Sgt Button was seen to approach Gordon, saying: “Hello. Sorry mate, can you stop for a second? Stop, all right, I need to speak to you.”

Asked what about, Sgt Button said: “Well, because potentially I think you may have been in the national news.”

When Gordon denied this, he was asked why he was running away and was ordered repeatedly to put down the stick he was carrying.

As the defendant resisted, he was told: “Relax yourself. You are under arrest until I confirm who you are.”

A distressed Marten then intervened, saying: “Stop with him please – he’s not well.”

She went on: “Oh my god, I can’t watch. Leave him alone. Let him eat his food. He’s starving.”

Another officer later turned to Marten and said: “I’ll level with you – you are under arrest for child neglect.”

Marten replied: “For doing what?”

She was then asked by officers: “Where’s your child? Where’s your child? Sorry, where is your child? We need to know.”

The defendant did not respond.

A dog handler then said: “Tell me now because I’m going to send the dog into the wood to try and find someone, so you tell me where it is now.”

A discussion could be heard about carrying out an “open search” before Marten was further arrested for concealment of the birth of a child.

Marten said it was “not an arrestable offence”, adding: “You can’t arrest someone for hiding a pregnancy.”

The Old Bailey trial continues.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.