Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Roll Call
Roll Call
Politics
Clyde McGrady

Congressional ‘gambling’ is out of control

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau exchange gifts in June as they settle a wager over an NBA basketball championship game between her Golden State Warriors and his victorious Toronto Raptors. (Caroline Brehman/CQ Roll Call)

Politicians have a gambling problem.

Mayors do it. So do governors and even prime ministers. But members of Congress are the worst offenders, and they’re getting out of control.

When it comes to sports, they simply can’t resist making “friendly wagers.” You know the routine by now: Ahead of the Big Game, two politicians whose teams will square off make a banal bet that usually involves some home-state products like peanuts, candy or sausage. And the practice only seems to be growing. These bets used to be reserved for the Super Bowl, the World Series or at least playoff matchups, but now even regular-season games are drawing action from members of Congress.

Not all bets are boring. Some (the best) involve genuine humiliation.

After his Los Angeles Dodgers lost to the New York Mets in a 2015 National League Division Series, Adam Schiff took to the House floor to pay his debt to fellow Rep. Steve Israel. Schiff, with the Mets logo attached to his necktie, gazed at the microphone, preemptively displaying the deep sense of regret he knew he’d be feeling shortly, and let out a sigh. “Now, Steve, this song is for you,” Schiff said, before rushing through the saddest rendition of “Meet the Mets” ever heard. It went on less than a minute, but it’s hard to imagine Schiff lasting one second longer. “Mr. Speaker, please tell me my time has expired,” he said when he was done.

Most of these wagers are opportunities for lawmakers to show their regular guy or gal bona fides, promote their home states and districts, and provide some easy “fun” content for their social media accounts. They are little more than thinly veiled PR for whatever home-state or district product the member wants to foist on to the public consciousness. Is Coca-Cola in your district? Then bet a caseload. Is it the home of Utz potato chips? Bet a pack.

Oh, and try not to be inauthentic. “In states where they have more than one team in the league, pick a side,” said one former senior congressional staffer. “If you’re a Yankees fan, you better not be betting for the Mets to win.”

Consider this an open letter: Unless you are willing to make an actual bet with actual stakes, please stop doing these.

Crab, Napa Valley wine and sourdough bread were on tap as California’s senators settled a Super Bowl bet with the Maryland delegation in 2013. (Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call file photo)

I admit there’s nothing inherently wrong with these bets, but they’re starting to become so commonplace that it’s hard to find any of them interesting. Rarely is anything of consequence on the line.

“It’s harmless and seems like it’s been going on forever,” said one former Capitol Hill staffer. “It’s better when there’s something really at stake.”

So how about putting more skin in the game?

At the very least, the boring food swaps have got to end. Members of Congress could learn a thing or two from mayors and governors, who appear to have tired of exchanging food products. (Yes, we all know Philadelphia is known for its cheesesteaks.)

Sometimes bets can be a pretext for charitable work. For instance, in 2011, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg agreed to assemble care packages for recently returned members of the armed services from Pittsburgh after his New York Jets lost to the Steelers in that year’s AFC title game. (That’s not to say he always shunned the food route: He collected 42 pounds of Dunkin’ Donuts coffee, 100 cups of clam chowder and lots and lots of ice cream from Boston Mayor Thomas Menino three years earlier when the Patriots lost to the Giants in the Super Bowl — all in the name of charity.)

If you’re hell-bent on food swaps, there’s a way to boost your home-state products while also making things interesting. By all means, bet your barbecue and chocolate, but at least up the quantity. For instance, if you’re from Kansas and your team wins the Super Bowl, how about asking a Californian to polish off 3 pounds of baby back ribs? I think we’d all want to see that.

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 13: From left, Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Rob Portman, R-Ohio, make symbols that spell "Ohio," as part of a football bet at the Senate steps, January 13, 2015. Ohio State beat the University of Oregon 42-20 in the national championship. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

Sen. John Kennedy missed a prime opportunity for this when the University of Alabama Crimson Tide football team lost to Kennedy’s Louisiana State University Tigers in November. The annual matchup is one of the biggest on each team’s schedule every year and usually determines who will go on to play for a national title. Even President Donald Trump showed for the game last season. So what did Sens. Kennedy and Richard Shelby of Alabama place on the line?

Sausage and chicken.

“I am betting as much extra-spicy Popeyes fried chicken as the senator can eat,” Kennedy said. “Popeyes chicken is among the best fried chicken God ever put breath in.” Shelby bet a double serving of Conecuh Sausage made in Evergreen, Alabama.

Instead of letting Shelby choose, Kennedy should have demanded he put down an entire 20-piece spicy. That way everybody wins.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.