Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World
Amelia Hill

Conflict between activists and zoos shows no sign of going away

Sumatran tiger cub at London Zoo
Zoos say they do valuable conservation work but their impact is limited as they are usually in temperate rather than tropical regions. Photograph: ZSL London Zoo/PA

A great treat for the kids with the gift of species conservation thrown in – or a wildlife prison? Trips to the zoo have become a far less simple day out than they used to be.

Animal rights activists have no doubt where the truth lies: “No one should ever support zoos,” said Peta, the animal rights organisation.

Captivity is a stultifying, daily torment for animals meant to freely wander vast distances, activists argue. Animals are meant to make their own choices about what to eat, where to sleep and who mate with – decisions taken from them in zoos.

Deprived of stimulation, research has found that many animals are trapped in spaces that are all-too-often “living hells”: three-quarters of British zoos, aquariums and petting farms have been found to regularly break minimum animal welfare standards.

Activists also point out that zoos abduct animals from their natural habitats under the guise of “species protection” and get rid of “surplus” animals either by killing them or by selling them to unethical exotic-animal dealers.

Zoos argue they do vital conservation work: they hold, research shows, nearly 15% of the global International Union for Conservation of Nature threatened species – although most zoos are concentrated in temperate regions, whereas most threatened species are tropical.

Activists argue that the vast majority of species kept in zoos are not endangered and nor do most zoos have any involvement with reintroduction programmes. “Conservation is a con,” said Peta.

Zoos argue that their role in educating the public is one their most important roles. A study of children between the ages of seven and 15 who visited London Zoo, however, found that for the majority of them – including those who took an educator-guided tour of the zoo – there were no positive educational outcomes. In many cases, the trip even had a negative impact on their understanding of animals and their habitats.

“And that makes sense,” said Peta. “We wouldn’t go to a prison to learn about typical human society, so why would we try to learn about animals by observing them in captivity?”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.