Below are is our summary of today’s key findings. With that, we will now be closing this blog. Thank you for following along.
Updated
Here is our full story on the report’s findings:
More from AAP:
Commissioners interviewed the Grafton-raised man, who is serving a lifetime sentence for the terror attack, as part of the 18-month investigation.
The report states the terrorist was “limited and on occasion non-existent” in his responses, and in some instances, answers to questions were not believed.
“That said, much of what he said was credible ... it provided insights into his activities and thinking,” it read.
The report states the terrorist expressed racist ideas from an early age, which first manifested as anti-Semitic and anti-Aboriginal comments at school.
The terrorist had few childhood or adult friends and did not work for seven years leading up to the terror act, financing travel abroad and to NZ using a payout from his father’s work-related exposure to asbestos.
From 2014 to 2017, the terrorist embarked on a worldwide tour, taking in south-east Asia, North Korea, central Asia and Europe, finishing up in Ethiopia.
The Royal Commission finds that the terrorist’s mobilisation to violence occurred in 2017, and that prior to this, he “travelled widely because he could and had nothing better to do”.
Report found terrorist radicalised on YouTube
The report also found the terrorist was radicalised on YouTube, the Google-owned video sharing-platform.
Jacinda Ardern said she would seek out company leaders to discuss its role in the terrorist’s pathway to mass murder, after being shocked to learn of YouTube’s role, AAP reports.
“What particularly stood out was the statement that the terrorist made that he was ‘not a frequent commentator on extreme right-wing sites and YouTube was a significant source of information and inspiration’,” she said.
“This is a point I plan to make directly to the leadership of YouTube.”
The terrorist made donations to far-right organisations and also frequented an extremist Facebook group called ‘The Lads Society’.
The report lists posts made by the terrorist to that group, including complaints over Muslim immigration and threats of violence towards local immigrants.
In January 2019, the terrorist was visited by his Australian-based mother in New Zealand.
She would later tell the Australian Federal Police she was “petrified” by his mental health and racism.
Updated
Report recommends mandatory reporting of gun injuries to authorities
As we reported earlier, the report found the gunman was treated in hospital months before the attack after accidentally shooting himself.
The report has recommended that “mandatory reporting of firearms injuries to New Zealand Police by health professionals” be introduced.
The report’s recommendations (in full here) fall under four themes:
- Strong government leadership and direction
- Engaged and accountable government decision-making
- Clarity of roles and responsibilities is critical
- New Zealand needs fit for purpose laws and policies
The full report has just been published online here.
The foreword begins:
We start by acknowledging whānau of the 51 shuhada, and the survivors and witnesses of the 15 March 2019 terrorist attack and their whānau whose lives have been forever changed. Those attacked at the masjidain were New Zealanders who had gathered together in peaceful prayer. The terrorist murdered 51 people and attempted to murder a further 40 people. His brutal actions were deplorable and incomprehensible.
The report also found the gunman was treated in hospital months before the attack after accidentally shooting himself. This from Stuff.NZ:
Medical staff never alerted police to his injuries.
At the time, there was no mandatory legislation regarding reporting gunshot wounds, but it is understood to be a recommendation made by the royal commission of inquiry into the attack, which will release its findings on Tuesday.
It is understood Dunedin doctors also treated the Australian-born shooter, who would become New Zealand’s first convicted terrorist, for issues arising from his steroid use.
Updated
Islamic Women’s Council of New Zealand: 'Justice has not been served by the report'
The Islamic Women’s Council of New Zealand (IWCNZ) have said in a statement that “justice has not been done served by the report”, which they say was severely restricted by its terms of reference.
There was a lack of transparency under the guise of confidentiality and national security, the IWCNZ says.
“There are multiple areas of evidence that have not been investigated, and questions raised by IWCNZ have been ignored.”
“We find it concerning that the Commissioners found systemic failures and an inappropriate concentration of resources towards Islamic terrorism, and yet state that these would not have made a difference to the terrorist being detected prior to the event.”
Updated
In August this year, before the gunman was sentenced to life in prison, Hamimah Tuyan, the widow of the 51st and final victim of 2019’s Christchurch shooting, also addressed the gunman in court, telling him her husband’s death elevated him from hero to martyr.
Zekeriya Tuyan battled for 48 days after 18 surgeries before succumbing to his injuries:
Are you in or from Aotearoa?
How do you feel about the report finally being released?
Let us know on Twitter @helenrsullivan.
Among the other initial measures Ardern has announced are:
- The establishment of a Ministry of Ethnic Communities
- Improvements to the police’s ability to identify and manage hate crime and deliver a service that is more responsive to victims,
- Improving research into extremism
- Creating an early intervention programme to support people showing early signs of radicalisation
Summary
Here is what we know about the report so far:
Key findings:
- The report found New Zealand security agencies were “almost exclusively” focused on the threat from Islamist terrorism, and the police had failed to enforce proper checks on firearm licenses. The Royal Commission of Inquiry said despite the shortcomings, there were no failings within government agencies that would have alerted them to the imminent attack by the white supremacist.
- Secrecy about counter-terrorism approaches by successive governments had consequences, the report says. “One reason for this was to avoid stigmatising Muslims. But had such a strategy been shared with the public and also incorporated a ‘see something, say something policy’, it is possible that aspects of the individual’s planning may … have been reported.”
- Other factors included: the terrorist’s “operational security”; the laws the security agencies work with; and the limited capability and capacity of the agencies.
- Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has apologised for “failings” by the security and intelligence agencies and within the firearms licensing system.
- The Royal Commission noted the attack “was driven by an extreme right-wing Islamophobic ideology. Its purpose was to promote chaos and disharmony in New Zealand”.
- It said “this purpose failed”: “In the days, weeks and months that followed, New Zealanders united around those affected and spoke out against racism, extremism and extremist violence,” the report read. “There was a period of national reflection about our shared values, our collective lives and what it means to live in New Zealand.
Key recommendations:
- The report’s recommendations include a new security and intelligence agency, a new counter-terrorism minister and strategy, and funding for research into NZ-specific extremism.
- They also include new anti-terror laws, hate speech laws, social cohesion measures and workplace diversity for the public sector.
- Ardern announced on Monday that she would appoint a new minister to implement the inquiry’s recommendations, telling reporters, “The [Muslim] community will want to see accountability in terms of the implementation, they will want to know who is responsible for coordinating some of those efforts and we will be providing that.”
Reactions to the report:
-
Muslim community leaders said report shows ‘institutional prejudice and unconscious bias’ exist in government agencies. The imam of the Masjid An-Nur (Al Noor mosque), Gamal Fouda, the spokesman for the Muslim Association of Canterbury, Abdigani Ali, and general secretary of the Linwood Islamic Centre, Faisal Sayed, said in a statement:“We’ve known for a long time that the Muslim community has been targeted with hate speech and hate crimes – this report shows that we are right.” The leaders added that the report, “shows that institutional prejudice and unconscious bias exists in government agencies and that needs to change.”
- New Zealand’s police commissioner, Andrew Coster, has apologised for the failures the report found in the country’s gun licensing system, saying that the police “could have done more”.
Ardern announced on Monday that she would appoint a new minister to implement the inquiry’s recommendations, telling reporters:
The [Muslim] community will want to see accountability in terms of the implementation, they will want to know who is responsible for coordinating some of those efforts and we will be providing that”
Secrecy surrounding counter-terrorism approaches had negative consequences, report finds
My colleague Phil Taylor reports that the 800-page document has that the terrorist’s “operational security”; the laws the security agencies work with; and the limited capability and capacity of the agencies were also factors.
The only information that should have alerted authorities to the terrorist attack was an email he sent to parliament eight minutes before beginning the attack.
Secrecy about counter-terrorism approaches by successive governments had consequences, the report said:
One reason for this was to avoid stigmatising Muslims. But had such a strategy been shared with the public and also incorporated a ‘see something, say something policy’, it is possible that aspects of the individual’s planning may … have been reported.
With the benefit of hindsight, such reporting would have provided the best chance of disrupting the terrorist attack.”
Stuff.NZ has laid out some more of the precautions taken – and suppression rulings made – by the commission:
The commission had to take care its processes or report could not be used for unlawful activities or damage the public interest. It made a series of suppression rulings including suppressing the names of police staff involved in granting the Australian national a firearms licence and the two people who vouched for the terrorist.
An interview with the terrorist was also permanently suppressed because of a concern it would be used by others to plan attacks and further spread the terrorist’s views. Evidence and documents provided by government agencies were kept secret for similar reasons.
The commissioners also decided the evidence provided by Government agency chief executives and current and former Cabinet ministers should be suppressed for 30 years, allowing public release in the future when national security concerns ‘dissipate’.”
The Royal Commission includes swathes of information previously classified as top secret, and material gathered from hundreds of interviews - including with the terrorist, ministers past and present, public service agency heads and affected communities.
Many interviews, including with Ms Ardern, are subject to 30-year suppressions.
The interview with the terrorist has been permanently classified.
Recommendations include new anti-terror and hate speech laws
The report’s recommendations include a new security and intelligence agency, a new counter-terrorism minister and strategy, and funding for research into NZ-specific extremism, AAP reports.
They also include new anti-terror laws, hate speech laws, social cohesion measures and workplace diversity for the public sector.
The challenging report also gives more details on the upbringing of the Australian terrorist.
The Royal Commission noted the attack “was driven by an extreme right-wing Islamophobic ideology. Its purpose was to promote chaos and disharmony in New Zealand”.
It said “this purpose failed”.
“In the days, weeks and months that followed, New Zealanders united around those affected and spoke out against racism, extremism and extremist violence,” the report read.
“There was a period of national reflection about our shared values, our collective lives and what it means to live in New Zealand.
Updated
Muslim community leaders say report shows 'institutional prejudice and unconscious bias' in government agencies
The imam of the Masjid An-Nur (Al Noor mosque), Gamal Fouda, the spokesman for the Muslim Association of Canterbury, Abdigani Ali, and general secretary of the Linwood Islamic Centre, Faisal Sayed, have said in a statement:
“We’ve known for a long time that the Muslim community has been targeted with hate speech and hate crimes – this report shows that we are right.”
The leaders added that the report, “shows that institutional prejudice and unconscious bias exists in government agencies and that needs to change.”
Stuff.NZ reporter Henry Cooke says that the report includes “a lot more detail about [the gunman’s] planning”, and finds that there was “no real focus on monitoring the internet for terror threats”:
There's in general a lot more detail about his planning. He was bulking up on a lot of steroids and sending himself detailed to-do lists and budgets.
— henry cooke (@henrycooke) December 8, 2020
Police Commissioner Andrew Coster apologises for gun licensing failures
New Zealand’s police commissioner, Andrew Coster, has apologised for the failures the report found in the country’s gun licensing system, saying that the police “could have done more”:
We accept that, in trying to assess whether the individual was fit and proper to hold a firearms licence, we could have done more to consider whether the two referees knew the individual well enough to serve as referees.”
Ardern apologises for 'failings'
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has apologised for “failings” by the security and intelligence agencies and within the firearms licensing system:
The Royal Commission found no failures within any Government agencies that would have allowed the individual’s planning and preparation to have been detected but did identify many lessons to be learnt and significant areas needing change.
...
For many years, the Muslim community has raised concerns over issues like the disproportionate scrutiny by security and intelligence agencies. This report confirms there was an ‘inappropriate concentration of resources’. It also identifies failings within the firearms licensing system.
The commission made no findings that these issues would have stopped the attack. But these were both failings nonetheless and for that I apologise.”
The government has accepted all 44 recommendations made by the report, including to establish a new national intelligence and security agency, and to appoint a minister to coordinate the government’s response to the report.
The government said it will also act on a proposal for the police to better identify, record and respond to hate crime, and deliver services more responsive to victims.
Security agencies 'almost exclusively' focused on threat of Islamist terrorism
The report has found New Zealand security agencies were “almost exclusively” focused on the threat from Islamist terrorism, and the police had failed to enforce proper checks on firearm licenses.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry, however, said despite the shortcomings, there were no failings within government agencies that would have alerted them to the imminent attack by the white supremacist.
Updated
While we wait for more findings from my colleague Phil Taylor, who has spent the morning in lockup with the report, here is a timeline of how the inquiry unfolded up until the report was presented to the government:
Inquiry commences: April 10, 2019
Initial engagement: April – May
Communities Engagement: May – October
Information and evidence gathering: May – September
Analysis and deliberations: August – December
Report development: January – November 2020
Report presentation: November 26, 2020
Royal Commission finds terrorist could only have been stopped by 'chance'
The embargo on the report has now been lifted.
Stuff.NZ reports that the inquiry has found that: “Despite signs, the Christchurch terrorist could only have been stopped ‘by chance’.”
We’ll have more on this shortly.
Islamic community told inquiry it knew it was 'vulnerable' to a terror attack
In November this year, New Zealand’s Islamic community told the Christchurch inquiry that it knew it was “vulnerable” to a terror attack, and that security forces had wrongly focused on terrorism committed by Muslim extremists.
Its conclusion was based on the community’s own review of a decade of media reports, parliamentary speeches, public addresses, online forums and other sources:
Updated
Before the sentencing, Janna Ezat, whose son Hussein Al-Umari was one of 51 people killed in the terrorist attack, came face-to-face with the gunman in court, and told him she forgave him.
“I have decided to forgive you, Mr Tarrant, because I don’t have hate, I don’t have revenge,” she said during victim statements. “The damage is done. Hussein will never be here. I have only one choice: to forgive you.”
Here is our video report of that moment:
In August this year, the 29-year-old gunman was sentenced to life in prison, in the first time under current New Zealand law that a sentence of life without the possibility of parole was imposed.
When given the chance to oppose the sentence in court, he chose not to.
“You present as a deeply impaired person motivated by a base hatred of people you perceive to be different from yourself,” Justice Cameron Mander, the presiding judge, told the court in Christchurch, as he pronounced the sentence.
“You have offered no apology or public acknowledgement of the harms you have caused,” he added. “While I appreciate that you have forsaken the opportunity to use these proceedings as a platform, you appear neither contrite nor ashamed.”
“You committed mass murder,” said Justice Mander. “You slaughtered unarmed and defenceless people.”
You can read our full story here:
Summary
Hello and welcome to our coverage of the release of the report into the Christchurch shootings.
My name is Helen Sullivan and I will be bringing you the report’s most important findings and recommendations as they are released.
If you have questions or comments, you can find me on Twitter @helenrsullivan.
On 15 March 2019, during Friday prayers, a white supremacist armed with automatic weapons stormed two mosques in Christchurch and killed fifty-one people.
Prior to the attack the gunman posted multiple references to his plan online, was able to legally obtain a gun licence, and carried out reconnaissance missions to both mosques.
In the wake of the shootings, a royal commission of inquiry into was established in order to determine why and how the massacre took place. The commission delivered its 792-page report to the government on 26 November.
The report will be made public today after having been shown to the families of the victims and survivors.
