Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Sport
Letters

Chris Froome case shows the inconsistencies of doping controls in sport

Chris Froome training in Mallorca, Spain on 14 December 2017
Chris Froome training in Mallorca, Spain on 14 December 2017. Photograph: Joan Llado/AP

Were Chris Froome (After Froome’s failed drugs test, is this the end for Team Sky?, 14 December) to be listed as a disabled athlete, he could inhale his salbutamol – as he has since childhood – and win the Tour de France against able-bodied competitors. He would then be a double hero. Is the World Anti-Doping Agency suggesting that disabled athletes who take medicines – and many will – are cheats?  

Such doping control inconsistencies are commonplace. While the doping authorities allow wealthy athletes to train at altitude in order to boost their erythropoietin (EPO) levels, poorer ones who get the same effect by injection are seen as cheats. The current arrangements are puritanical nonsense.
Joe Collier
Emeritus professor in medicines policy, St George’s, University of London

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.