Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Mirror
Daily Mirror
Politics
Ben Glaze

China lashes out at UK, US and Australia for fuelling 'arms race' with submarine pact

Britain, the US and Australia have “gone further down a dangerous road” with the allies’ submarine pact, China claimed today.

Beijing reacted furiously to the announcement of a deal to build boats which can counter the Chinese threat in the Pacific. In a chilling warning to the West, it claimed the decision would fuel a new arms race.

China's foreign ministry said the three countries had "disregarded" concerns of the international community.

“This is a typical Cold War mentality which will only motivate an arms race, damage the international nuclear nonproliferation regime, and harm regional stability and peace,” said spokesman Wang Wenbin.

“The latest joint statement issued by the US, UK, and Australia shows that the three countries have gone further down the wrong and dangerous path for their own geopolitical self-interest, completely ignoring the concerns of the international community."

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin (AFP via Getty Images)

He claimed Aukus poses a “serious risk of nuclear proliferation and violating the object and purpose of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” - even though the submarines will be nuclear-powered rather than carrying nuclear weapons.

The vessels will not be nuclear-armed and the NPT allows the transfer of fissile material for non-weapons use, like naval propulsion, without the need for monitoring by the UN watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.

“The three countries claim that they will abide by the highest nuclear non-proliferation standards, which is pure deception,” insisted Mr Wang.

In a series of tweets, the Chinese mission to the United Nation said the move clearly breached the "object and purpose" of the NPT.

"The nuclear submarine cooperation plan released today by Aukus is a blatant act that constitutes serious nuclear proliferation risks, undermines international non-proliferation system, fuels arms races, and hurts peace and stability in the region," it said.

"The irony of Aukus is that two nuclear weapons states who claim to uphold the highest nuclear non-proliferation standard are transferring tons of weapons-grade enriched uranium to a non-nuclear-weapon state, clearly violating the object and purpose of the NPT.

The submarines built under the Aukus pact will eventually replace the Royal Navy's Astute-class fleet of attack boats (Getty Images)

"Such a textbook case of double standard will damage the authority and effectiveness of the international non-proliferation system.

"We urge the trio to honour their obligations as members of the NPT and respond to the (will) of the international community."

The backlash was triggered by this week’s summit in San Diego, California, where Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, US President Joe Biden and Australian PM Anthony Albanese outlined details of the latest stage of the Aukus partnership.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, US President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak held a press conference at a naval base in San Diego (Kyodo)

Australia will get its first nuclear-powered submarines under the agreement.

It will also provide the Royal Navy with replacements for its seven Astute-class attack submarines - potentially doubling the size of the fleet of its hunter-killer boats.

At a launch ceremony at a US naval base, Mr Sunak said the Aukus agreement was dedicated to keeping the oceans "free, open and prosperous" and "maintaining freedom, peace, and security now and for generations to come".

The agreement is expected to create thousands of jobs at British shipyards, with the UK's submarines mainly being built by BAE Systems at Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria.

The trio announced unprecedented collaboration on building nuclear-powered subs (AFP via Getty Images)

Meanwhile, Security Minister Tom Tugendhat rejected Tory criticism of the Government's Integrated Review of defence and foreign policy for classifying China as a “challenge” rather than a “threat”.

“It's important that we stay aligned with our two partners here - Australia and the United States - and they've gone for the word ‘challenge’. I'm fine with that,” he said.

“But we've also got to be open to the fact that in some areas, it's also a threat.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.