A planned debate involving Candace Owens has sparked fresh controversy before either side has even taken the stage. A viral exchange on X has shifted the spotlight away from scheduling details and onto the very purpose of the discussion. Critics now argue the real issue is whether Owens will defend the claims she has made over the past year, while supporters and opponents continue to debate what should be on the agenda.
Get breaking news anytime, anywhere. Download the TOI app now!
Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson clash over what the debate should cover
The latest online dispute began after Candace Owens responded to arrangements for an upcoming debate. In her post, she wrote:
"Sure you can get a clarification:
Yes, next Friday would work with me.
Yes, you can bring your cameraman if he makes you feel better. So you are now approved to bring four members of your team, plus a cameraman, plus I have just approved your moderator. (For clarity, this makes your team bigger than my own, and I am fine with that).
No, you don't get to now add in this weird stipulation regarding a “one hour cross examination”. You have been requesting a debate since May. We will debate the Tyler Robinson case and the evidence which you claim is overwhelming. And I said as long as it takes. No time limit. If you feel it can be done in 3 1/2 hours, then great. If you need longer then we can keep going."
