Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles Times
National
Maura Dolan

California's top court rules for police in a pursuit accident case

SAN FRANCISCO _ A police department with a policy requiring 100 percent of officers to certify they read and understood the agency's policy on vehicle pursuits is not liable for an accident even if all the officers failed to sign, the California Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday.

In a decision written by Justice Ming W. Chin, the state high court interpreted California law to require policies mandating 100 percent officer certification to be enough for a department to be immune from a lawsuit.

The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit against the city of Gardena by the mother of a passenger in a truck that police were pursuing for a cellphone robbery.

About a minute into the pursuit, a Gardena officer rammed the truck, causing the death of a 19-year-old passenger.

The mother of the young man sued, citing a 2005 state law that police agencies could retain liability from accidents triggered by chases only if the departments had a police pursuit and required all its officers to certify in writing that they had read and understood.

Gardena had a pursuit policy, but about 10 percent of its officers had not certified they had read it.

Monday's ruling was a victory for Gardena. State law says departments can avoid liability if they have pursuit policies requiring 100 percent compliance, but they don't have to show that every officer met the requirement, the court said.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.