Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times

Singapore Court declines stay of Byju’s founder’s sentence

The High Court of Singapore declined a stay on the six-month jail sentence of Byju Raveendran, meaning the founder of the failed education startup risks going to prison if he returns to the city-state.

The court on July 9 ruled against Raveendran’s application to have the sentence halted, his law firm Lazareff Le Bars said in a statement Tuesday. The court originally pronounced the sentence, for contempt, in May, and then granted a stay on it last month until the next hearing.

The rejection marks the latest setback for Raveendran, a former teacher who founded online tutor Think & Learn Pvt, widely known as Byju’s. The company turned him into a billionaire and made him one of the major success stories among a wave of Indian startups, but it later collapsed following a rapid expansion and alleged corporate governance lapses.

Raveendran has appealed the May ruling to Singapore’s Court of Appeal.

“Mr. Raveendran maintains that he did not breach any court order, intentionally or otherwise, and will continue to pursue every lawful remedy through the proper legal process,” J. Michael McNutt, a lawyer at Lazareff Le Bars, said in the statement.

A Singapore High Court spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Raveendran is facing claims from foreign investors around the world, including in the US where lenders are fighting to claw back losses from a $1.2 billion loan that soured.

In Singapore courts, Raveendran is being pursued by a subsidiary of the sovereign wealth fund Qatar Investment Authority, which participated in a funding round for the tech firm as it was cutting jobs and laying off staff. QIA said in a statement it welcomes the latest ruling and will continue to pursue all legal remedies against Raveendran.

Raveendran isn’t presently in Singapore and there is no certainty of when, or whether, he plans to travel to the country, McNutt said.

“In the future, should he be in, or intend to travel to, Singapore, he may appeal then and the court will deal with it,” McNutt said. “The order has no practical effect unless and until he chooses to enter Singapore.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.