Your elected representatives aren't paying attention to what they're passing: "Last week, Representative Mike Flood of Nebraska admitted during a town hall meeting in his district that he did not know that the ["big beautiful"] bill would limit judges' power to hold people in contempt for violating court orders," reports The New York Times. (This provision seems to be a direct MAGA response to the judges who have issued injunctions that block the president's ability to rule by executive order.) "Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said that she had been unaware that the mega-bill she voted for would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade." Of course, it's a 1,037-page bill; most lawmakers voting on it will not read it in full. Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), for his part, called on his colleagues to "take more than a few hours to read a bill this big and this consequential." Maybe he was right.
Republicans almost universally voted with their party on this bill, rushing to meet the House speaker's Memorial Day deadline to get it through the finish line. "It's hard to read over 1,000 pages when things keep changing up to the last minute before we voted on it," complained Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.), as if she doesn't have the power to, like Massie, advocate for more time and thoughtfulness.
The bill extends tax cuts passed by Republicans back in 2017 and makes certain tax code changes, "including lower marginal income rates, a larger standard deduction and a higher threshold for the estate tax," per the Times. Americans will soon be able to deduct car loan interest from their taxable income, as long as the cars are manufactured domestically. The child tax credit (with tightened standards) will be enlarged, and newborns born between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2029, will now receive "Trump accounts" with $1,000 deposited in them. University endowment taxes would rise, drastically. SALT deduction caps will be massively raised. Medicaid will have very strict work requirements attached to it.
But some have been sharply critical of the "big beautiful bill" saying it will add to the budget deficit:
I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore.
This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 3, 2025
"In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," wrote Musk, which is…odd given that he was President Donald Trump's right-hand man, and this bill has been a huge priority of the Trumpist right, even if they're now claiming they didn't understand what was in it.
Hegseth takes issue with Harvey Milk: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has apparently decided that the renaming of the ship USNS Harvey Milk is a priority in order for the Navy to make inroads "reestablishing the warrior culture." Other ships considered for renaming are the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez, and USNS Medgar Evers. We wouldn't want any DEI ships, you know.
But Hegseth seems to misunderstand that Harvey Milk is not some random gay icon just known for progressive activism; Milk actually served in the Navy and was a freedom-appreciator throughout his life, with somewhat idiosyncratic views.
He hated commies, he campaigned for Barry Goldwater, and he got pissed off at San Francisco's city bureaucrats who forced him to pay unnecessary fees when trying to open a camera store. "Let me have my tax money go for my protection and not for my prosecution," said Milk once at a rally in San Francisco. "Let my tax money go for the protection of me. Protect my home, protect my streets, protect my car, protect my life, protect my property." Seems pretty freedom-loving to me. (More on this from John Fund at National Review.) Milk's legacy, like many others, is complicated: He befriended and vouched for the heinous Jim Jones—yes, that one—and allied with the Teamsters. At times, he embraced progressive causes that libertarians would chafe at. But he was politically rather interesting, shaped by a wide variety of influences over his life.
Milk's actual career in office was very short: He was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977 and was killed (along with Mayor George Moscone) the following year by Dan White, a former city supervisor who had disagreed with Milk's sponsorship of a bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation in public accommodations, housing, and employment. (There were other tensions between White and colleagues that also led to White's resignation from the board of supervisors and his violent act.)
To some degree, the naming of the ship after Milk is a small way to right historic wrongs: Milk resigned from the Navy, accepting an "other than honorable" discharge in 1955, because he was in danger of being court-martialed due to his participation in an unspecified "homosexual act." It's unclear how real that was vs. just a means of pushing a gay man out of the service. In 2021, the Navy made efforts to posthumously upgrade this discharge, which were rebuffed by Milk's family members.
Of all the things Hegseth could focus on, this is a strange one that feels like pointless pandering to the MAGA base—assuming they know very little about Milk's actual life and beliefs.
Scenes from New York: For the record, I don't think we should deport politicians with terrible socialist beliefs; I think we should defeat them. Zohran Mamdani has clown beliefs, but there's just no value in stooping to the low "deport!" insult. You can't deport U.S. citizens over their foolish beliefs (…yet). And the fact of the matter is, even if you got the actual aspiring politician the heck away from public office, there's still a not-insignificant percentage of New Yorkers who believe his rent freeze and city-owned grocery store ideas are good ones; the actual ideas have to be swatted away with good arguments.
Let's just talk about how insane it is to elect someone to any major office who hasn't even been a US citizen for ten years—much less a radical leftist who actually hates everything about the country and is here specifically to undermine everything we've ever been about.
Deport. https://t.co/Xv4bQWUuSI
— Councilwoman Vickie Paladino (@VickieforNYC) June 3, 2025
QUICK HITS
- "There was pretty clearly an agenda not just to cut contracts, but to do so by bringing some software development in house, which is actually very wise—and long overdue," writes Jennifer Pahlka of the Department of Government Efficiency. "I know of a few teams that have quietly gotten more staff since the start of the Trump term, and are delivering better results by firing poor-performing contractors and writing the software themselves. But those teams are in the minority. For most teams, their contracts have been canceled without much of a plan. Similarly, software (insourced or not) was supposed to replace people, but the people are gone without the software. They cut the workforce without cutting the work."
- Why do so few states track and publish the curricula they use? "You would think that states would be hustling to understand the curriculum used in each district, and to publish that information openly," writes Karen Vaites on her Substack. "You would be wrong. In recent years, just six states have published a map of the curriculum used in local districts." Those include Rhode Island, Colorado, Massachusetts, Ohio, Nebraska, and possibly Minnesota soon. (Wisconsin had done this but let the domain expire; the data was scraped and is still available elsewhere.) In Massachusetts, the publicly-available data "spawned a powerful investigation by the Boston Globe," adds Vaites, "which reported that 'nearly half of all Massachusetts public school districts last year used a reading curriculum in their elementary schools that the state considers low quality.'" Meanwhile, The Boston Globe found that "Massachusetts's wealthiest school districts are also, strangely, the most likely to stick with a reading curriculum the state frowns on."
- "Trump administration officials delayed and redacted a government forecast because it predicts an increase in the nation's trade deficit in farm goods later this year, according to two people familiar with the matter," reports Politico. "The numbers run counter to President Donald Trump's messaging that his economic policies, including tariffs, will reduce U.S. trade imbalances. The politically inconvenient data prompted administration officials to block publication of the written analysis normally attached to the report because they disliked what it said about the deficit."
- "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" posted Trump on Truth Social at 2:17 a.m. this morning. This is most likely in response to escalating (and reciprocal) accusations that trade deals have been violated.
- Actually yes:
As porn becomes more and more ubiquitous in culture, the archetype of the "noble prostitute" a la Dostoevsky & Balzac continues to disappear from art.
— Vincenzo Barney (@BarneysRubble0) June 3, 2025
The post Buyer's Remorse appeared first on Reason.com.
