
The British government’s decision to advice its citizens against non-essential travel to Lebanon has spurred fears of the Levantine country descending into security turmoil that compounds the suffering of the Lebanese who are already ailed by political, economic and social collapse.
Many explanations for the UK’s move have surfaced.
“The decision can be linked to parliamentary elections being around the corner and the possibility of problems arising to pave the way for undermining the vote,” a security source who requested anonymity told Asharq Al-Awsat.
Meanwhile, a military expert pointed to the UK government fearing surprises and unexpected developments that could remind them of their experience with the Afghan capital, Kabul, and the failure of Western countries to evacuate their nationals.
“The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) now advises against all but essential travel to Lebanon, except for those areas to which the FCDO advises against all travel,” the British government said in a statement.
The British call caused confusion among Lebanese government institutions. A security source said that Lebanese security services were left in the dark regarding the reasons behind Britain’s sudden decision.
“The security situation in Lebanon is still under control, and the agencies are implementing a proactive security plan in anticipation of any development,” the source, who requested anonymity, told Asharq Al-Awsat.
However, the source did not rule out the UK’s decision being linked to the proximity of parliamentary elections. Many fear that pre-election security tensions would develop into something worse.
“Security agencies and ministries do not rule out creating problems, especially if the elections’ course or results are contrary to the desire of some internal parties,” pointed out the source.