Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Bristol Post
Bristol Post
Sport
Sam Frost

Bristol Rovers' stance on salary cap revealed as Sunderland and Portsmouth battle EFL proposals

Sunderland and Portsmouth are the only League One clubs to oppose new salary cap rules proposed by the EFL, according to a report.

A flat salary cap across all three divisions has been mooted by EFL chairman Rick Parry, and the Sun on Sunday reports the vast majority of clubs are in favour of the concept.

Bristol Rovers, Bristol Live understands, are in favour of wage control after the coronavirus pandemic exacerbated the financially instability of EFL clubs.

But the Black Cats and Pompey are reportedly firmly against the idea of a flat salary cap, which they feel be an unfair “levelling of the playing field”.

Sunderland’s wage bill is among the largest in League One, and they comply with current rules which see clubs spending on player contracts capped to a percentage of their expected turnover.

But the new proposals from the EFL would see a universal salary cap, which would force then likes of Sunderland to be tied to the same wage bill limits as much smaller clubs like Accrington Stanley – despite attracting tens of thousands more supporters to games.

The EFL hopes a salary cap would reduce the risk of more clubs going to the wall after Bury were expelled from the FA last season.

But Sunderland CEO Jim Rodwell made his opposition to the proposals clear in a recent interview with Chronicle Live.

"We don't think that the proposed flat cap on salaries makes sense,” he said.

"We are all for running sustainable football clubs, but sustainability is not the same as levelling the playing field.

"Next thing you know there will be conversations about sharing gate receipts like they did in the early 1980s.

"I think the EFL are oversimplifying the sustainability issue.

"For a lot of clubs in League One, a £2.5m cap on wages is highly attractive, but our argument is that as a big football club we can generate more revenue and therefore we should be able to spend that revenue on players while remaining sustainable.

"This issue is not supposed to be about level playing fields, it is supposed to be about sustainability and trying to avoid what has happened to Wigan this week, and to Bury last summer.

"We agree with sustainability, but this is not the way forward at all."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.