John Bercow has dramatically ruled that Theresa May cannot hold another vote on her Brexit deal unless the proposed agreement has changed "substantially".
In a major blow to the prime minister, the Commons speaker invoked a centuries-old rule that says the same motion cannot be voted on more than once in the same parliamentary sitting.
Ms May was reported to be planning a third "meaningful vote" on her deal this week, although Downing Street said it would only happen if there was a "realistic prospect" of success.
If no vote happens in the coming days, she is now expected to ask European leaders for a lengthy extension to the two-year negotiation process, delaying Brexit for months or even years beyond March 29.
To follow events as they unfolded, see our live coverage below
"I want to vote against it because I don't believe when parliament defeated it by the biggest margin in the history of parliament that was because it was in any way a good deal, and the substance of the deal hasn't changed."
He added:"The question people like me are going to have to answer is: can we get to no deal instead?"A two-year extension is basically remaining in the European union. No deal is still the best option."Mrs May's deal, however bad it is, takes us out of the European Union.""There is a hierarchy. No deal is better than Mrs May's deal, but Mrs May's deal is better than not leaving."

Theresa May’s resignation publicly demanded by MPs as price for backing Brexit deal
Backbenchers said deep party splits exposed by recent votes mean the prime minister’s time is up"It violates the Conservative manifesto in many important ways. The manifesto is very clear that no deal is better than a bad deal."
"It's a lot of people, and it goes far wider than the [European Research Group], who have been particularly keen to have the right kind of Brexit."

Trump appears to claim UK invented Russia interference in 2016 election to 'bait' US into taking its side
US president shares tweet by founder of right-wing conspiracy theory website"My views have been clear on not just the meaningful vote, but, actually, the Withdrawal Agreement.
"And on January 29 I voted for alternative arrangements when it came to the Withdrawal Agreement.
"And so nothing has changed."
"The deal remains flawed. The backstop's legal risk remains unchanged - we could be trapped indefinitely. I will vote against.
"The law as it stands says we are leaving on March 29 with or without a deal. I intend to honour that. It is now up to parliament if it wishes to ignore the result of the largest democratic exercise this country has ever seen."
The deadline is 7pm on Tuesday for tabling the necessary motion for the vote to take place on Wednesday – the last day before Thursday’s EU summit, at which Theresa May will otherwise ask for a long Article 50 extension.
The vote could still take place on Tuesday, as talks with the Democratic Unionist Party continue, but hopes of quickly persuading the party to step into line appear to be fading.
At the regular briefing for journalists, the prime minister’s spokesman confirmed she will need to be sure there is a “realistic prospect” of success before holding another ‘meaningful vote’.
If it is not staged – or if it is lost – the spokesman would not say whether Ms May would then head to Brussels with a “specific proposal” for how long Brexit would have to be delayed.
Another big headache is May’s European Parliament elections, which No 10 again insisted the UK would have to take part in if Article 50 was extended beyond the end of June.
They have already been scrapped in legislation, so MPs would have to vote to reinstate them – with a deadline of the middle of April for doing so, after which the UK would be committed to going to the polls.