The legal battle over Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament for five weeks is being heard at the Supreme Court, with Gina Miller’s legal representative arguing the prime minister “abused his power”.
Mr Johnson has pledged to “obey the law” but said he wanted to “wait and see what the judges say” before his government decides whether to recall parliament.
It comes as Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson claimed she is a “candidate for prime minister”, while Tory MPs condemned Luxembourg’s prime minister Xavier Bettel for conducting a press conference next to an empty lectern.
To follow events as they unfolded, see our live coverage below:

Liberal Democrats will halt Brexit ‘on day one’ if they win parliamentary majority in snap election
Jo Swinson says she is standing as ‘candidate for prime minister’ in election which may come within the next few months
Boris Johnson suggests his new Brexit proposals will be kept secret until UK and EU have 'done the deal'
Prime minister also refuses, seven times, to say how he will defy the law to avoid a Halloween crash-out – declining to rule out taking parliament to court
How Europe's press reported Boris Johnson's 'humiliation' in Luxembourg
'In the end, the man who has defined himself as the Incredible Hulk has become invisible'
Justice Secretary refuses to rule out shutting down parliament again and casts doubt on Queen's Speech
Asked if a second prorogation is 'remotely conceivable', Robert Buckland says events are too volatile to make predictions



Cameron has never looked and sounded more like the heir to Blair. Brexit is his Iraq | Tom Peck
Cameron asked the country to solve his party's problems, a huge strategic mistake and a crushing failure of leadershipIn the Supreme Court, the historic case to determine whether Boris Johnson unlawfully suspended Parliament is just getting under way.
Lady Hale, the president of the court, makes clear that the 11 judges hearing the case are “not concerned with the wider political issues that form the context of the legal issue”. She says their ruling will not determine in any way "when and how the UK leaves the EU".
Lord Pannick then opens the case against Mr Johnson on behalf of Gina Miller.
He says his side will argue that:
"The prime minister advised Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament for as long as five weeks because he, the prime minister, wishes to avoid... the risk that Parliament during that period would take action to frustrate or to damage the policies of the government."
