WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden appeared unwilling to bend to pressure, including from European allies, to extend a massive evacuation effort from Afghanistan, planning — for now — to stick to his Aug. 31 deadline for troop withdrawal.
“We are currently on a pace to finish by Aug. 31. The sooner we can finish the better,” Biden said when he entered the Roosevelt Room at the White House. “The completion by Aug. 31 depends on the Taliban continuing to cooperate and allowing access to the airport.”
On a chaotic day at the White House, Biden’s scheduled remarks on Afghanistan were delayed for five hours as aides huddled to assess the fast-moving situation.
When he finally addressed the situation, Biden said he has asked the Pentagon and State Department to develop contingency plans “to adjust the timetable should that be necessary.” The president said, however, that he was mindful of “increasing risks” to troops the longer the U.S. keeps forces on the ground, mentioning in particular the group ISIS-K, an Islamic State affiliate in Afghanistan and an enemy of the Taliban.
Leaders of the Taliban, the Islamist militant group that has seized most of the country including the capital and government, have warned of dire “consequences” if the U.S. misses the deadline set by Biden.
At a news conference in Kabul, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said an extension of the U.S. presence would be “a violation of the agreement” and suggested the extremist militant group would no longer allow Afghans passage to the airport beyond the deadline, according to an interpreter. The path to the airport had already become a deadly gantlet for many.
“We want them to evacuate all foreign nationals by the 31st of August, and we are not in favor of allowing Afghans to leave,” Mujahid said, through the interpreter.
Administration officials said, however, they are exploring a presence beyond the deadline that would allow Western forces to keep the airport open. At the same time, they have pointed to the rising numbers of people being evacuated as evidence the military may be able to complete its rescue mission by the deadline. But after Biden’s promises not to leave behind any Americans or thousands of Afghans who aided the U.S. war effort, his decision not to continue the operation into September could do just that and will likely draw even stronger criticism from lawmakers in both parties who have urged him to extend it.
“Damn the deadline,” said Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., in a statement urging Biden to extend the mission until it’s completed. “Mr. President, tell the Taliban we’re getting our people out however long it takes, and that we’re perfectly willing to spill Taliban, al-Qaeda, and ISIS blood to do it.”
If the deadline holds, it leaves just seven days to evacuate the remainder of American citizens and the Afghan nationals who aided the U.S. Already U.S. and NATO forces at the Kabul airport have significantly increased the number of airlifts out of the country, in part by conducting missions to assist Americans and others in reaching the airport.
Biden said 70,700 people had been evacuated since Aug. 14, and that 12,000 people had been taken out of the country by U.S. and coalition forces in just the the last 12 hours. The pace of evacuations picked up as commercial airlines began supplemental flights to help alleviate the bottleneck by transporting evacuees out of other countries that received them from Kabul.
State Department officials in Kabul are holding virtual meetings with Taliban representatives there about the withdrawal and airlifts, administration officials said. The Washington Post also reported, citing anonymous sources, that CIA Director William Burns held a secret meeting this week with Taliban leader Abdul Ghani Baradar, presumably to discuss the deadline, among other issues.
“What does not end when the military mission ends is our commitment to at-risk Afghans,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said. “I don’t want to delve into hypotheticals as to what that end date might be.” He cited Taliban commitments to provide safe passage to Americans and others seeking to leave the country, though chaos outside the airport has been a constant, according to reporters on the ground.
“As with all Taliban commitments, we are focused on deeds, not words,” Price said. “What matters to us is the follow-through. What matters to us is the follow-through both now, before Aug. 31, and the follow-through after Aug. 31.”
The U.S. and some European allies believe an incentive for the Taliban to allow troops to remain beyond the deadline is maintaining a functional airport. They note that any Taliban attempt at portraying its leadership as legitimate would require a functioning airport.
“The Taliban has also said publicly that they want an Afghanistan that has a relationship with the rest of the world,” Price said. “They want to ensure that Afghanistan under a future Afghan government is not the pariah that it would become in certain circumstances. The fact is that this cannot happen without a functioning airport. A functioning state, a functioning economy, a government that has some semblance of a relationship with the rest of the world, needs a functioning commercial airport. We are in discussions with the Taliban on this very front.”
Over his first eight months in office, Biden has sought to convince wary allies that America “is back,” and that democracies can band together and prevail over autocratic regimes.
Beyond the topic of the withdrawal deadline, the meeting focused on other aspects of the fallout from the Taliban’s expeditious toppling of the Afghan government: how to maintain gains made over 20 years in the areas of girls’ education and women’s rights, potential economic sanctions and the withholding of international aid and financial backing for the new regime, and whether to recognize the Taliban as the official leaders of Afghanistan.
Following the meeting, British Prime Minster Boris Johnson emphasized areas of agreement, stating that the leaders settled on a strategy for how to deal with Taliban that would leverage the group’s economic, diplomatic and political power to pressure the new Afghan government.
“Afghanistan can’t lurch back into becoming a breeding ground of terror, Afghanistan can’t become a narco state, girls have got to be educated up to the age of 18,” Johnson said.
The G-7 and other major Western powers have sought to evince a united front, and the Biden administration has repeatedly emphasized global solidarity, including a recent United Nations Security Council resolution calling for talks to form a new Afghan government and ensure human rights, among other issues. The council’s statement included the signatures of China and Russia, which often veto such measures when sponsored by the U.S. Another frequent talking point by Biden advisers is the coalition of around 100 countries that signed a statement demanding any Taliban government respect international diplomatic norms and human rights.
But less publicly, many of Washington’s allies have been furious with Biden’s handling of the chaotic and deadly U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. That includes British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, host of Tuesday’s G-7 meeting. He and other Europeans believe they had been reassured by Biden in June that U.S. troops would remain as long as necessary to ease a smooth withdrawal.
Tom Tugendhat, a member of Parliament from Johnson’s ruling party and who served in Afghanistan, last week said it was “shameful” for Biden to blame the astoundingly swift collapse of the Afghan government on soldiers refusing to fight. On Tuesday he told the BBC that he realized extending the withdrawal deadline by a few days was a “risk” but possible and thought the Taliban would go along.
Spaniard Josep Borrell, the European Union’s foreign minister, chose diplomatic language to comment on Biden’s recent contention that the U.S. did not go into Afghanistan to nation-build. “That is arguable,” he said.
“This is a particularly bitter development,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said at a news conference in Berlin last week. “Bitter, dramatic and terrible.”
That Biden is receiving such criticism from allies — allies who embraced him warmly after he replaced the contentious former President Trump — underscores the challenge he faces in once again proving that the United States “is back.”
———
(Los Angeles Times staff writer Nabih Bulos contributed to this report from Kabul.)
