SACRAMENTO, Calif. _ Few California Democrats have attracted more praise from the party's various constituencies than Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who has led the state's charge against the administration of President Donald Trump with 47 lawsuits on issues including immigration and health care.
But in recent months, Becerra has come under criticism from progressives and civil rights leaders for his reluctance to support legislative checks on police use of force. That could have ramifications for an ambitious politician who seems primed for higher offices.
On Tuesday, Becerra announced that his office would not seek criminal charges against two Sacramento police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Stephon Clark, an unarmed black man.
While that decision was not unexpected, it built on another recent controversy in which Becerra was sued by civil rights groups for not releasing use-of-force records. He later outraged many progressive allies by threatening legal action over police misconduct records he said were improperly released to the media.
Becerra has long walked a line of presenting himself as both a civil rights defender and a friend of law enforcement. But has also disappointed some supporters for not taking a stand in support of legislation that would toughen use-of-force rules, or on a proposal that the state Department of Justice routinely provide independent investigation of police shootings.
"A Democratic attorney general, in particular, is kind of torn between two worlds _ the law enforcement entities and officials with which he or she must work and build credibility with, and Democratic constituencies that are highly suspicious of, if not downright hostile to, law enforcement," said Garry South, a Democratic political consultant.
"Becerra is now caught between these two constituencies in a pretty public way," said South, who managed Gov. Gray Davis' 1998 and 2002 campaigns, which portrayed Davis as a law-and-order Democrat. Sen. Kamala Harris faced the same pressures when she was attorney general, South said.
Capitol watchers see Becerra as a possible contender some day for higher office, including governor or U.S. senator if one of those jobs opens up.
But Becerra risks alienating key voters by his handling of the Clark case and his refusal to take a position on legislation making it easier to prosecute police officers, said the Rev. Shane Harris, a civil rights activist who has long served as a delegate for the California Democratic Party.
"He needs to realize that if he wants to be governor someday, he is going to need black votes and brown votes," said Shane Harris, president of the People's Alliance for Justice. "If he has any aspirations, they just went out the window for now. This right here really took him backward when it comes to the black vote in the state of California."
Shane Harris said Becerra could regain ground with minority voters by supporting tough reform legislation and embracing calls for the attorney general's office to independently investigate all fatal police shootings.
Gov. Jerry Brown appointed Becerra as attorney general in 2017 after he served 12 terms in Congress _ a perch that provided little opportunity to be involved in state discussions of law enforcement oversight. Many activists did not know where he would stand on policing matters.
He won election last year with strong support from police groups, including the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association political action committee, the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs PAC, the Long Beach Police Officers Association and the Oakland Police Officers Association PAC.
Becerra is too close to the law enforcement community, said Melina Abdullah, a professor of Pan-African Studies at California State University, Los Angeles and a member of the Black Lives Matter movement.
"I think the complete unwillingness of the attorney general to intervene in the murders of black people by law enforcement _ even under the most extreme circumstances, like Stephon Clark _ demonstrates either a completely failed moral compass or a shameful submission to political cowardice," Abdullah said.
On Tuesday, Becerra defended his actions in police use-of-force cases as "by the book" and based on the evidence.
He resisted the idea that his office should routinely "parachute in," as he calls it, and investigate officer-involved shootings that are now reviewed by county prosecutors.
"I don't have the capacity and the resources to try to take over the work of 58 different DAs in this one shop," Becerra said.
He said local prosecutors are "far closer" to what is going on in their communities.
He said he knows the black community feels hurt by the shooting of Clark, but added: "I think there is a lot of hurt in the Police Department too, because they are under a microscope and two of their fellow officers are now under a microscope."
The attorney general's actions on law enforcement issues have frustrated some people who supported his election last year, including civil rights attorney John Burris, who represented Rodney King in his civil rights lawsuit against the Los Angeles Police Department.
"I'm disappointed," Burris said after Becerra's announcement in the Stephon Clark case. "I supported him wholeheartedly. I think I had higher hopes for him in the beginning."
Burris said he has asked Becerra in the past few years to look at other police shootings and the attorney general has always sided with the local district attorneys in not pursuing action against officers.
"At the end of the day, the attorney general is law enforcement, and they have to work with law enforcement throughout the state," Burris said. "That's what makes it very difficult for him and others to be very critical of the local police unless the evidence is overwhelming."
The Clark decision was not the only action that concerned some Becerra allies.
Becerra is under criticism from groups including the First Amendment Coalition, which sued him last month after he refused to release records related to investigations of shootings or confirmed cases of sexual assault by officers.
The lawsuit alleges that Becerra is required to turn over the documents by a law that was approved last year. Police unions have sued to keep records from being released.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California is "very disappointed" that Becerra is refusing to make public records ordered released by the state Legislature, said Melanie Ochoa, a staff attorney for the group.
"It is unfortunate that the state's top cop is sending a message that it is OK for agencies to deny the public access to information about serious police misconduct and uses of deadly force _ particularly when we already have numerous courts that have decided that agencies must release this information," Ochoa said.
Becerra's actions on the release of records are defended by Robert Harris, a director with the Los Angeles Police Protective League.
Harris praised Becerra for withholding such records in the Justice Department's possession while court cases deciding whether the law applied to investigations of incidents that occurred before this year were pending.
"I think that's an appropriate decision until we have a definitive answer," Harris said.
Becerra defended his actions on the release of police misconduct records, citing privacy laws.
"My progressive values are still there," Becerra told the Los Angeles Times. "If I have your Social Security numbers, and there's a good chance I do in one of my databases ... you would not want me to disclose it lightly. My job is to protect that privacy."
In January, in response to a group of journalists in Berkeley, the state's Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training released a list of 12,000 names of police officers and job applicants who had been convicted of crimes.
Becerra later said the state office made a mistake in releasing the names to reporters for the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California, Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism.
In a letter, he told the reporters to destroy the records, arguing that possession of the data was a criminal offense.
Becerra said this week that his letter to Berkeley was part of due diligence to enforce the law.
"Someone needs to ask the folks that are in possession of information that they are unauthorized to possess or use, what don't they understand about the law that says, 'You are in possession of information that you shouldn't have.' It's like stolen property," he said.
The attorney general also finds himself in the center of a storm of controversy over possible legislative measures to reduce excessive force.
Becerra refused Tuesday to take a position on pending legislation by Democratic Assemblywoman Shirley Webe that would make it easier to criminally prosecute law enforcement officers who kill civilians.
Police unions and chiefs are supporting a separate measure that would instead focus on internal department policies and training.
Becerra said he has not taken a position on the two use-of-force bills because he has not read them yet and he wanted to first complete the investigation into the Clark shooting, which he wanted to be seen as independent and fair.
"I have not gone through the bills to the point of making decisions," Becerra said at a news conference on the Clark shooting. "I will get involved because it's important. I don't intend to be AWOL when it comes to the discussion of how we write this new chapter."
