Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business
Letters

Balancing online safety with the right to anonymity

A finger pressing the twitter app on a mobile phone
Making anonymus comments on social media is ‘like shouting at someone on the bus’ writes John Freeman. Photograph: Dado Ruvić/Reuters

Owen Jones (Banning anonymous social media accounts would only stifle free speech and democracy, 25 October) is right that the online safety bill requires serious consideration. There are real abuses that need to be tackled, but that must not mean a wider trawl to censor opinion critical of authority and the government.

We have been here before, when letters were the means used to deliver threats in the early 19th century. EP Thompson reviewed some of the letters in his essay The Crime of Anonymity and discovered a wide range of issues, from personal threats to industrial grievances. In many cases, the authors were brought to trial and sentenced to transportation or death.

However, this is different to another well known form of written communication, the pseudonymous letter. These were usually harmless, often jokes, although sometimes whistleblowing. Their online equivalent must not be criminalised.
Keith Flett
Tottenham, London

• Owen Jones says that banning anonymous social media comments would stifle free speech. Nonsense. The Guardian itself agrees – I had to give my name, address and phone number before this letter could be considered. That’s as it should be; I am glad that readers cannot make anonymous comments – and this doesn’t stifle my rights to free speech.

And I don’t make anonymous comments on social media – that just feels a bit like shouting at someone on the bus or in the street.
John Freeman
Kingswinford, West Midlands

• There is a distinction to be made between anonymity and validation. Publishing anonymously is quite different from publishing as a different person from the apparent publisher. While noting that there is a long tradition of publishing either anonymously or under a nom de plume, the intrinsic problem is not being able to know exactly who has posted anything on the internet.

Ways of proving one’s identity and/or whether the originating IP address is from a trustworthy or untrustworthy source would do far more to address these problems, without any impact on free speech. As so often in today’s world, it is transparency that is in short supply.
Paul Komierowski
Ballyconnell, County Cavan, Ireland

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.