Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Record
Daily Record
Lifestyle
Josie Clark & Lucy Farrell

Baby food pouches ‘more sugary than Coca-Cola’ warns dentist amid rising tooth decay in children

Parents are being warned that many popular baby food pouches contain more sugar than Coca-Cola. This comes as dentists are seeing an "epidemic" of tooth decay among young children. The news is a result of a survey by the British Dental Association (BDA), which examined the sugar contents of over 100 baby food pouches.

When it comes to babies, it can be tough for new parents to know what's best for their newborns. Understandably, brands which specialise in baby foods are trusted to use only healthy ingredients.

But even seemingly healthy ingredients, like fruit, contain high amounts of natural sugars which can be harmful to babies' teeth. The survey found that out of 109 pouches aimed at children under 12 months old, more than a quarter contained more sugar by volume than Coca-Cola.

According to findings, fruit based pouches advertised to infants as young as four months old contained sugar levels equalling up to 150% found in the sweet soft drink. Almost 40% of products surveyed were marketed at babies "four months plus" despite both UK and World Health Organisation guidance recommending weaning from six months old.

The findings jarred with marketing claims that the products contained only "naturally occurring sugars" or "no added sugar", or that they were "nutritionally approved" or in line with infants' "nutritional and developmental needs", the BDA said. All products found to be high in sugar adopted so-called "halo" labelling, focusing on their "organic" status or that they were "high in fibre" or contained "1 of your 5 a day", potentially misleading parents into thinking they were making healthy choices, the report warned.

The BDA singled out "boutique" brands including market leaders Ella's Kitchen and Annabel Karmel for appearing to have higher levels of sugar than traditional baby food brands or own-brand alternatives. Manufacturers said high levels of natural or locked-in sugar was inevitable with fruit-based pouches, but some brands managed to offer similar products containing around half the sugar of the worst offenders, the survey found.

The BDA also warned that infants often sucked directly from the pouches, for the convenience of caregivers while on the move. This ensured the food spent more time in contact with baby teeth and increased the risk of erosion and decay. The BDA noted a lack of clear messaging from manufacturers advising that infants should not consume the products directly from the pouch, with Annabel Karmel packaging and the brand's website explicitly stating "eat straight from the pouch".

The Department of Health and Social Care is expected to consult imminently on the marketing and labelling of infant food. Dentist leaders said the excessive levels of sugar in many infant pouches warranted action, including clearer "traffic light" labelling and potential expansion of the Sugar Levy to encourage reformulation.

Analysis by Action on Sugar last year of 73 baby and toddler sweet snacks such as rusks, biscuits, oat bars and puffs found that only six products (8%) would be given a green (low) label for sugars. BDA chairman Eddie Crouch said: "Disingenuous marketeers are giving parents the impression they are making a healthy choice with these pouches. Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Claims of 'no added sugar' are meaningless when mums and dads end up delivering the lion's share of a can of Coke to their infants.
"Tooth decay is the number one reason for hospital admissions among young children, and sugar is driving this epidemic. These products sadly risk hooking the next generation before they can even walk.

"Ministers need to break the UK's addiction. They must ensure sugar becomes the new tobacco, especially when it comes to our youngest patients." A spokeswoman for Annabel Karmel said: "Annabel Karmel's organic purees are inspired by her much-loved homecooked recipes.

"They are specially designed for babies and contain 100% fruit with no added salt or sugar. The limited sugar content comes from naturally occurring sugars found in the fruits used."

An Ella's Kitchen spokeswoman said: "At Ella's Kitchen, we take infant nutrition very seriously and, since 2016, building on recommendations from Public Health England, we have been reducing the proportion of higher sugar fruits like bananas in our recipes, as well as introducing lower sugar fruits and 100% vegetable pouches, bringing down sugar on average across the range by 20%.

"Any new products aim to be 10% less sugar than the range average as a commitment to ongoing sugar reduction in stage 1 recipes.
We do not advise that little ones consume our purees directly from the pouch, instead recommending that they be consumed from a spoon and eaten as part of a varied diet including lots of homemade foods."

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: "We have challenged businesses to improve the nutritional content of baby food and drink, as our review in 2019 found inconsistencies between national recommendations and the ingredients and nutritional content of these products."

Don't miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond - Sign up to our daily newsletter here .

READ MORE

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.