I'm afraid John Kampfner has swallowed a line on the alternative vote that does not stand up (It's not just about Nick, 4 January). The bill has been in committee in the Lords during the last month, and ministers have agreed that the AV system proposed does not mean "candidates having to secure more than 50% of votes cast". If voters can use as many choices as they wish, some will not use them all. In such a system some MPs will be elected with fewer than 50% of votes cast. If it was compulsory, as in the Australian system, to use all your choices then the claim is true.
The second claim that he swallows is that it brings an end to tactical voting. Not correct. The tactical vote moves to the second choice. I guarantee that at least one Lib Dem candidate will issue advice to supporters only to use one choice, or to target the second choice so that they will not be damaged.
I feel terrible. I am in favour of PR and Clegg is making me support the status quo, rather than this corrupt AV system.
Jeff Rooker
Ludlow, Shropshire
