Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
USA Today Sports Media Group
USA Today Sports Media Group
Sport
Charles Curtis

Athletes are citing HIPAA wrong in vaccine discussions, so here’s a lawyer to explain it

When Dak Prescott was asked about his vaccination status back in July, he responded with, “I don’t think that’s exactly important. I think that’s HIPAA.”

Two-time NASCAR Cup Champion Kyle Busch had this to say in August: “I look at all of that stuff as very personal, very choice-driven and nobody needs to know what people’s choices are. But now everybody’s asking for vaccination status cards and everything and where you go, so I guess HIPAA doesn’t exist any more.”

Just this past week, Los Angeles Lakers forward Kyle Kuzma tweeted, then deleted, “So when did following HIPAA rules correlate to being Anti-vaccinated.”

Dwight Howard cited it too (see below).

They’re all misusing and misunderstanding what HIPAA — the Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act signed into law in 1996 — is and what and whom it protects. And it’s not just athletes. Politicians are having some trouble with it, too.

So this post is here to help. I reached out to Matt Fisher, the General Counsel at a telehealth company called Carium. More importantly for our purposes, he’s an expert in HIPAA law who writes extensively on the subject (full disclosure: He’s also a friend and former college classmate of mine at Haverford College).

In this Q&A, Fisher will break down the law and what the correct usage of it actually is:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.