Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
National
Christian Boone

As Chauvin trial concludes, Rayshard Brooks’ case drags on

ATLANTA — Their names have been intertwined since last June, when Rayshard Brooks, 27 was fatally shot in a downtown Wendy’s parking lot after resisting arrest for a suspected DUI.

Less than three weeks earlier, in Minneapolis, George Floyd, 46, died after police confronted him for allegedly trying to pass a counterfeit $20 bill. For nine minutes and 29 seconds, Officer Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck and back. This week, Chauvin was remanded to state custody after jurors found him guilty of two counts of murder and one count of manslaughter for actions that led to Floyd’s death.

As family members expressed gratitude for the verdict and relief that they will not have to re-live George Floyd’s death again, Brooks’ relatives face a long and uncertain slog. The two Black men have been linked by tragedy, each, according to social justice activists, killed needlessly by overzealous cops. One has been resolved in court. The other doesn’t even have a prosecutor yet.

It’s not simply a question of when former Atlanta Police Department Officer Garrett Rolfe will head to trial. Rolfe, charged with murder, fired three shots at a fleeing Brooks after the suspected drunken driver fought with him and another officer. That officer, Devin Brosnan, was charged with aggravated assault by former Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard.

Howard’s handling of the case, currently under state investigation, led the longtime DA’s successor, Fani Willis, to seek recusal in January, saying her prosecutorial staff had been compromised by Howard’s actions.

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr denied Willis’ request, saying he believed her office could carry out a fair prosecution of the officers. Willis asked him to reconsider but Carr held firm, telling her the “matters are personal to your predecessor” and “do not pertain to your office.”

Now it’s up to Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Christopher Brasher to decide this jurisdictional squabble, now in its fourth month. In an order signed earlier this month, Brasher ordered Willis to produce, in private, evidence of a conflict of interest. He’ll then rule whether her office should be disqualified.

But that won’t solve everything. Willis could decide to reduce the charges or drop them altogether. She has said previously that Howard’s rush to bring charges will ultimately benefit the defense.

Those options would also be available to a new prosecutor, if one is assigned.

“With no prosecutor to handle the case, it might never be resolved,” Rolfe’s attorney, Noah Pines, wrote in a motion to dismiss.

Pines also argued that the turf war between Willis and Carr is unfair to his client because of the “restrictive conditions” of his bond. Rolfe must wear an ankle monitor and abide by a court-imposed curfew.

The delays have also taken a toll on Brooks’ family, said one their attorneys, Justin Miller.

“You think these police are getting prosecuted and it doesn’t start,” he said. “They’re in jail and they’re out of jail. What the family needs, and wants, is a road to closure.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.