Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Nottingham Post
Nottingham Post
Sport
Luke Pawley

Arsenal told Nottingham Forest loss could have been even worse after 'totally wrong' controversy

Former Premier League referee Keith Hackett believes Nottingham Forest should have been awarded a penalty against Arsenal.

Forest beat the Gunners 1-0 at the City Ground on Sunday to advance to the fourth round of the FA Cup.

The home side had appeals for a penalty waved away when Bukayo Saka fouled Jack Colback in the second half.

Hackett believes Forest had a "strong case" for a penalty and can feel aggrieved by the "totally wrong" decision to only have VAR at some grounds during the competition.

“I think they had a strong case [for a penalty],” Hackett told Football Insider.

“It was a careless challenge. Forest had a good shout.

“We didn’t have VAR in this particular game. One, it must be difficult for the referees because one week they are operating with VAR and the next they are not.

“We’ve talked about this lazy approach towards refereeing where they almost lean towards a mindset of ‘If it’s a big decision, I’m not going to give it, I’m going to wait for VAR’.

“I thought it was a penalty kick, it was a careless challenge, they got away with it.

“It’s totally wrong. You either have VAR in every game, which is not feasible. Don’t use VAR until you come to the semi-final and final that are played at Wembley.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.