Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Birmingham Post
Birmingham Post
Business
Angus Young & David Laister

Apartment plans resubmitted for Hull's dangerous derelict Lord Line site

Plans to demolish Hull’s longest-running derelict landmark have been resubmitted.

The former Lord Line trawler company offices overlooking what used to be St Andrew’s Dock have been empty since the mid-1970s.

An almost identical application to bulldoze the vandal-hit building and replace it with a new 40-apartment complex on the cleared site was refused by Hull City Council’s planning committee last November.

At the time, councillors voted unanimously to refuse the application by Manor Mill Resorts Ltd.

The councillors supported their own planning officers who claimed the isolated site was not suitable for housing and criticised the quality of the proposed design.

Some councillors also called on the company to consider selling the building to let someone else attempt redevelop it instead.

The Lord Line building, once a bricks and mortar sign of the prosperity of Hull's fishing fleet. (Reach Plc)

Although the Lord Line is owned by Manor along with the dock’s adjacent pump house and hydraulic tower, the surrounding land is under separate ownership.

As yet, there has not been a co-ordinated attempt involving all the landowners to come up with a joint redevelopment scheme for the old dock, which was once home the world’s largest deep-sea fishing fleet.

Instead, Manor has submitted a series of applications for the Lord Line, including initial proposals to convert the building as part of a student campus which never got off the ground.

Now the firm has resubmitted a similar application to last year’s to build a four-storey residential scheme which includes ground floor parking.

The main difference appears to be an increase in the number of proposed apartments from 40 to 42

The latest application says: “Every effort has been made to utilise the building structure and proposals put forward and costed based on refurbishing the existing building as it stands.

“Unfortunately, the condition of the building now prevents this from happening.

“This building is now considered a danger to the public. It is imperative this area is brought back to life in the interest of the public’s safety.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.