A former top prosecutor has called for the Metropolitan Police to reopen a probe into allegations disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor sexually abused Virginia Giuffre.
Nazir Afzal said the force should look again at claims the former Duke of York slept with trafficked Ms Giuffre in London amid what he called feelings of “two-tier justice”.
King Charles stripped his brother of his prince title on Thursday, following months of pressure over Andrew's ties to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Scotland Yard probed allegations relating to Andrew and Epstein’s activities three times and opted not to investigate.
But the force said it is “actively looking” into claims that the royal tried to use his taxpayer-funded bodyguard to smear his accuser Ms Giuffre.
“Public confidence has been shaken by this,” Mr Afzal, ex-chief prosecutor for North West England, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“People do feel that there is some two-tier justice here; that if you are powerful, you don’t get the same level of attention as you would do if you were, say, homeless.”
Of the claims that Andrew asked a police officer to dig dirt on Ms Giuffre, he added: “The Met have said that they will investigate this independently but there has to be full transparency about this.
“I can’t ask for someone’s social security number – there is no reason why he should be able to do that and that means that somebody then acted in a way they shouldn't be able to do and carried out some kind of misconduct in public office.
“We need public clarity. We need to ensure that nobody has special or privileged status. That investigation needs to go forward and I am sure it will and if any misuse of police assets has taken place – there needs to be accountability.”
It comes as members of a US congressional committee investigating the Epstein case said Andrew should answer questions about his links to the billionaire.
Democrat Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi told BBC Newsnight that he wants Andrew to give evidence before Congress, saying: “I would go so far as to subpoena him.”
He added: “Now, enforcing the subpoenas is not easy for somebody who’s on foreign soil.
“However, if Andrew wishes to come to the United States or he’s here, then he’s subject to the jurisdiction of the US Congress, and I would expect him to testify.”
He delivered a message to Andrew: “Come clean. Come before the US Congress, voluntarily testify. Don’t wait for a subpoena. Come and testify and tell us what you know.
“At the end of the day, we want to know exactly what happened, not just to give justice to the survivors, but to prevent this from ever happening again.”
At least four Democrat members of the House Oversight Committee have renewed calls for Andrew to testify - although the panel is controlled by Republicans, who have not indicated they would support the move.
Congressman Suhas Subramanyam told BBC Radio 4’s Today: “If he wants to clear his name, if he wants to do right by the victims, he will come forward.
“Frankly, Andrew’s name has come up many times from the victims.
“So he clearly has knowledge of what happened and we just want him to come forward and tell us what he knows.“
Andrew could appear remotely, have a lawyer present and could speak to the panel privately, said Mr Subramanyam.
He added: “No matter who it is - American or not - everyone should be looked at.”
Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer representing some of Epstein’s victims, also called for Andrew to testify.
He told BBC News: “We need to hear his story and hear what he is saying about what occurred, but also he could testify about other potential co-conspirators that he saw that may have been present at the mansions here in the States that were doing inappropriate activities.
“So on both fronts, both on behalf of other victims, but potentially on behalf of himself, we would like Andrew to come here and testify.”
He added of the removal of Andrew’s titles: “The victims are very glad that the crown is taking this action, that the King has recognised the seriousness of this situation, and his statement the other day was appreciated by the victims.”
The Metropolitan Police said it was made aware of allegations around non-recent trafficking for sexual exploitation in 2015 which “related to events outside the UK and an allegation of trafficking to central London in March 2001”.
They added that following the legal advice, “it was clear that any investigation into human trafficking would be largely focused on activities and relationships outside the UK”, so officers concluded that “other jurisdictions and organisations were better placed to pursue the specific allegations”.
And in November 2016, a decision was made that this matter would not proceed to a full criminal investigation, the force said.
Meanwhile, the eyes of the world continue to be fixed on Royal Lodge after the news Andrew will move from Windsor to private accommodation in Sandringham, Norfolk.
On Saturday morning a car bearing a private numberplate linked to the former prince was seen leaving the grounds of Windsor Great Park.
It has been claimed Andrew is set to get a six-figure payout and an annual payment as part of his “relocation settlement” after being forced out of the Royal Lodge.
Former prince Andrew will receive the one-off payment to cover his move, followed by the regular stipend to prevent him from “overspending in his new life as a commoner”, The Guardian newspaper has reported.
The annual payment privately funded by the King would be worth several times his £20,000-a-year navy pension, the paper adds.
The report of the payout comes as claims suggest that the decision to strip Andrew of his honours and titles was influenced by the Queen’s concerns about his impact on her work with sex abuse victims.
According to The Daily Telegraph, Camilla was appalled by Andrew’s association with paedophile financier Epstein and felt the ongoing row was getting in the way of her public duties.
The Queen has supported survivors of sex attacks and domestic abuse for years and it was recently revealed in a new book that she herself fought off a man who groped her on a train when she was a teenager.
The Times reported Andrew agreed to leave Windsor after his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson made it clear that she would be leaving the property.
She will not be moving to Sandringham and will have to find her own property to live in.
Earlier in October, it was announced Andrew had agreed to stop using his titles but would remain a prince and retain his dukedom ahead of the publication of the memoirs of the late Virginia Giuffre, who had accused the former duke of sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager.
There have been a series of damaging newspaper allegations including that Andrew tried to get the Metropolitan Police to dig up dirt for a smear campaign against Ms Giuffre.
The force said previously it is looking into the allegations after The Mail On Sunday newspaper claimed Andrew passed Ms Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his taxpayer-funded bodyguard in 2011 and asked him to investigate.
The Public Accounts Committee has already confirmed it is writing to the Crown Estate, effectively Andrew’s landlord, and the Treasury asking for further information about the prince’s lease which caused a public outcry when it emerged he was paying a “peppercorn” rent.
Charles’ actions are already bearing fruit as Andrew’s name has been struck from the official roll of the peerage which means his Duke of York title will no longer be used officially.
In the next few days, the King is expected to send to the Lord Chancellor David Lammy the royal warrant, affecting the dukedom, and letters patent which will formally remove Andrew’s entitlement to use the title prince and HRH style.
The former duke had a “cast-iron” lease for his Royal Lodge home and only after negotiations with the King’s representatives did he agree to serve formal notice on Thursday to surrender the lease, which had more than 50 years left to run.
