Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Technology
Jim Carroll

All ad agency accounts end in failure – but how do we handle defeat?

Trophy
‘We are too emotional in the immediate aftermath of failure and too rational when the dust has settled.’ Photograph: Radius Images/Alamy

I recently attended the Artist and Empire exhibition at Tate Britain. It boasts portraits of British aristocrats in unfamiliar local garb; maps and mementos; etchings of exotic wildlife; and, inevitably, partisan paintings of triumphs and treaties.

I was struck by the fact that there were also a good many images recording defeat: heroic deaths, military martyrdoms, hasty retreats. You can see the demise of General Gordon at Khartoum; the last stand of Major Allan Wilson at the Shangani; and, in a rather portentous painting, an only known survivor making his way into Jalalabad, Afghanistan. Creating a positive narrative around disaster seems to have been a Victorian speciality. I imagine the intention of these tragic images was to convey a sense of nobility; a reinforcement of values; a commitment to persevere.

The exhibition prompted me to consider how we engage with failure in commerce. How good are we at dealing with defeat?

Whether we like it or not, defeat is an everyday reality for even the most successful modern business. Brand owners have to recognise that their customers are endlessly fickle, their competition will occasionally outflank them, often their new product launches will founder. Agencies have to concede that they will generally lose more pitches than they win, most of their output will go unrewarded and, like political careers, all accounts end in failure.

Of course, we are taught that mistakes are essential to entrepreneurship. Loss is a source of lessons and learning. We want to “treat every failure as an opportunity”. We endeavour to “fail forwards”. We love “burning platforms”. We “mustn’t waste a good crisis”.

This doesn’t mean we have a ticker-tape parade every time someone messes up. In truth, despite the management wisdom, we tend to be superstitious about loss. It punctures momentum. It lingers like a bad odour. You don’t want to get too close.

From my time in the agency world, I recall that one’s initial response to defeat was often to cry foul, to blame failure on the foolishness of the clients or the perversity of the process. Personally, I would immediately seek comedy in defeat. I found it had a short-term restorative effect.

The first question after an intensive six-week pitch for a luxury brand came from the laconic representative of China, the most important growth market: “Where is the luxury in this?” We knew immediately the game was up …

In time, we commission reviews, postmortems and wash-ups. We ask for client feedback. We pose the difficult questions. We scrutinise procedures and personnel.

However, excessive self-reflection can be counterproductive. We find ourselves seeking scapegoats, reaching for the blame gun. So the audits and introspection start to damage morale. I well recall being reprimanded by a younger colleague who felt that the agency leadership’s painful honesty was undermining collective confidence. And we thought we were being fashionably transparent.

My former boss, Sir John Hegarty, didn’t subscribe at all to the conventional view of defeat: “Many people talk about failures as opportunities to learn. Saying this seems to make people feel wise and worldly. Well I say bollocks to failure. Don’t dwell on it. Move on. Forget it.”

John’s contention resonates well with creative people. They have to insulate themselves against damaging negativity – they must look forward to opportunity, not back at disappointment. Maybe we could all benefit from a little indifference to defeat.

In my opinion, we are generally too emotional in the immediate aftermath of failure and too rational when the dust has settled.

I wonder, should we adopt some of the Victorians’ myth making? Perhaps, rather than embarking on earnest self-examination, we ought to seek the emotion in error, find heroism in loss, defiance in disaster. We should use missed opportunities as a means of reinforcing belief, commitment and values. Setbacks don’t just illuminate the way forward; they galvanise the collective spirit.

And I’d still maintain that, just occasionally, it helps to laugh in the face of failure.

Jim Carroll is the former UK chair of BBH. He writes about culture and business at jimcarrollsblog.com

To get weekly news analysis, job alerts and event notifications direct to your inbox, sign up free for Media & Tech Network membership.

All Guardian Media & Tech Network content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled “Brought to you by” – find out more here.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.