Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
National
May Bulman

Afghan man who came to UK as child tried to take his own life after being threatened with removal to Rwanda

Hakim Khan

An Afghan man who came to the UK as a child says he tried to take his own life after being told he faces deportation to Rwanda under the government’s new asylum removal policy.

Hakim Khan, 32, told The Independent he would “rather die” than be sent to the east African nation after he was detained at Brook House removal centre this month.

“I tried to take my life the day before yesterday ... I just want to be free, I want to be with my family, I want to be a human,” the asylum seeker, who first arrived in the UK as a child in 2008, said. “I have hopes like other people. I want to have rights. There are no deportations to Afghanistan – why are they keeping me here?”

Mr Khan is among around 100 asylum seekers thought to have been issued letters – known as “notices of intent” – which state their cases are being reviewed to assess whether they can be “removed elsewhere”, including Rwanda under the UK’s new migration deal with the country.

Ministers say the £120m deal, announced in April, will see thousands of people shipped 4,000 miles away to Rwanda to have their claims processed.

When he arrived in Britain in 2008, Mr Khan claimed asylum but this was refused when he turned 18 four years later, he said.

He remained in the country for several years before travelling to France and claiming asylum there, but he was returned to the UK under the Dublin regulations, which stipulate that one should claim asylum in the first country they submitted an application.

He reapplied in the UK and his claim was again refused, at which point he returned to France where he was homeless with “no home, no food, no nothing”.

Home secretary Priti Patel, pictured with Rwandan foreign minister Vincent Biruta, faces ongoing criticism over the scheme (AP)

Upon returning once again to the UK on 14 May 2022, he was immediately detained and served the letter informing him he could be sent to Rwanda.

Home Office figures published on Thursday revealed that one in four (24 per cent) of people arriving in the UK in small boats are from Afghanistan, indicating that a considerable number of Afghans will be targeted for removal to Rwanda.

Mr Khan said that following the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in August 2021, family members – apart from his elderly mother who decided to stay – have left and are making their way to Europe to seek refuge.

He said he has extended relatives and friends in the UK and that he wished to remain here with them. “I’ve been here for years. I want to enjoy my life in the UK,” he added.

Campaigners have raised alarm about access to legal advice and mental health support for people who are told they may be subject to the Rwanda removal policy.

Emma Ginn, director of Medical Justice, said the charity was worried the notices of intent to remove people to Rwanda would result in increased levels of self-harm in detention, and warned that safeguards to protect vulnerable people were “failing”.

She cited a recent audit of 45 of the charity’s detained clients, which found that 87 per cent had suicidal and/or self-harm thoughts, and that segregation was routinely used in response.

“There is potential for even worse situations than during the concentrated programme of charter removal flights in 2020, characterised by high levels of distress, self-harm and suicidal ideation,” she added.

There are also concerns about a lack of translation services to ensure people understand what the letter means.

Ms Ginn said that one of Medical Justice’s clients from the Middle East had been given a notice of intent letter but that he “did not understand” it as it was in English and he had not been provided with a translation, raising concerns about a lack of interpreting services in detention.

When Mr Khan was first served the notice of intent, he sought legal advice from the Detained Duty Advice scheme (DDAS), under which government-contracted law firms offer detainees up to 30 minutes of free legal advice.

But he said the lawyer he was appointed failed to help him.“The solicitor wasted my time. I sent the document to them by fax, but they kept saying they didn’t receive it,” he said.

Mr Khan’s case has now, on the referral of charity Movement for Justice, been taken on by another law firm which is challenging the Home Office’s decision to issue him the notice of intent letter.

Karen Doyle, of Movement for Justice, said: “The reality for people in the detention centres is that they are denied access to good legal advice.

“People are allocated a lawyer from the duty scheme and are therefore under the impression that they have a lawyer representing them. They speak to them over the phone, they give all details and history, and then the lawyer assesses whether they can take the case on – and often they can’t.

“But while doing this they waste time. There’s not a sense of urgency, and these asylum seekers only have seven days to put in a submission to the Home Office.”

The Home Office has been approached for comment.

If you need to speak to someone, the Samaritans are available 24/7 on 116 123.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.