Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
Nino Bucci

Lehrmann inquiry head could outline any adverse findings against individuals and institutions within days

Bruce Lehrmann
A draft report of the inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann is expected to be handed down by the end of the month. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP

The head of the inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann is expected to tell individuals and institutions within days whether he intends to make adverse findings against them for their conduct during the case.

The independent board of inquiry established to investigate the ACT criminal justice system’s handling of the case has likely completed hearing evidence, chair Walter Sofronoff KC said. He expects to inform parties if he intends to make findings against them by 9 June.

Sofronoff expects to complete a draft report by the end of the month and hand down the final report by the end of July.

Earlier, the ACT victims of crime commissioner, Heidi Yates, said she would consider walking a sexual assault complainant to court again and accompanying them while they spoke to the media despite being criticised for similar conduct in support of Brittany Higgins.

Yates has been criticised for her role in supporting Higgins, who alleged her former Liberal party colleague Bruce Lehrmann raped her in a minister’s office in Parliament House in March 2019.

Lehrmann, who pleaded not guilty to one count of sexual intercourse without consent, has always denied the allegation of rape and no findings have been made against him.

Yates noted that concerns about her walking into court with Higgins during Lehrmann’s trial were not raised until after the trial was completed, but that if they had been she would have considered not doing so, in order to promote “public faith and understanding in my office”.

Yates was also asked by counsel assisting the inquiry, Erin Longbottom KC, whether it was appropriate that she stood next to Higgins when she made a speech outside court after the jury had been discharged in Lehrmann’s trial.

Yates said she had left the courtroom with Higgins earlier after it appeared she was having a panic attack, and she was concerned Higgins could have a similar attack or even collapse while addressing the media.

She said that it had become clear in her dealings with Higgins that she only had a small circle of people she could trust, and that changes in the circumstances of cases made her particularly vulnerable to the point that she may self-harm.

Police had alerted Yates after finding material on Higgins’ phone that showed she had researched self-harm, she said.

The inquiry heard Yates had sought Higgins’ permission to share details about the extent of the support she provided.

Yates said her main focus after the jury was discharged was ensuring that Higgins was safely able to make her way from court to her hotel.

While she had not ever stood with a complainant outside court when they spoke to media, she said other commissioners had done so.

But Yates said that in hindsight she should have considered the content of the speech, and also would have liked to review the judge’s comments in discharging the jury, given she had missed the end of the hearing while assisting Higgins.

“I’m very open to the likelihood that if I had more information to consider I may have made a different decision,” she said.

Yates also said that she had never before been interviewed by police in relation to support she had provided a complainant, as she had been in this case.

She told the inquiry that after an interview with police on 26 May 2021, Det Supt Scott Moller told Higgins that the charge could not go ahead and it would “all be for nothing” if she continued to speak with the media.

Yates said that Moller had previously made similar statements, but on this occasion he was louder, harsher, used his hands to emphasise his point, and it was “directive, rather than informative”.

She said Higgins “started to slump in her chair, she started looking down, and I believe she started to cry”.

Yates said she immediately intervened, telling the inquiry she had previously dealt with other complainants in sexual assault matters who blamed themselves for charges collapsing and wanted to ensure Higgins and police knew it would not be the complainant’s fault if a similar outcome occurred in the Lehrmann case.

Sofronoff, the former Queensland solicitor general, said that it appeared Moller was saying two things: that Higgins should not speak to the media, and that if she did the case would collapse.

Yates confirmed to Sofronoff that her reason for intervening was related to the second element of Moller’s directive: that Higgins would be to blame if the case collapsed.

The hearing continues.

• In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email or In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is at 988 or chat for support. You can also text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis text line counselor. Other international helplines can be found at

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.