Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Miami Herald
Miami Herald
National
Carol Rosenberg

Accused al-Qaida commander wants to know if he can leave Guantanamo if acquitted

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba _ Defense lawyers asked a Marine judge Tuesday to order the prosecution to find out if a man accused of running the al-Qaida army in Afghanistan will get out of Guantanamo if he's acquitted or completes a war crimes sentence.

"What are we doing here? Let's abate these proceedings until we get an answer to this question," said Brent Rushforth, lead lawyer for the man charged as Abd al Hadi al Iraqi, who could be sentenced to life in prison if he's convicted. "We don't know what his fate will be no matter what the outcome of this trial will be."

Rushforth said for the trial to "be fair and meaningful under the rule of law" the accused, who says his real name is Nashwan al Tamir, needs to know if he would be allowed to go if he's found not guilty or sentenced to a shorter term.

"That's an impossible request," prosecutor Navy Lt. Cmdr. B. Vaughn Spencer replied, "even if the government had a crystal ball and could foresee the future."

Essentially Rushforth was asking the judge, Marine Col. Peter Rubin, to wade into the Forever War thicket, and seek an answer about an outcome over which he has no control. Congress has given the president the authority to hold captives in the War on Terror for the duration of the conflict. Only a federal court _ not the war court _ has the authority to declare a Guantanamo captive unlawfully detained and order the Pentagon to release him.

Rubin at one point wondered aloud whether the answer might be: "It depends, asterisk, on a number of factors unknown at this time."

Rushforth, who earlier defended uncharged, since-released Guantanamo captives, said the question implicates defense strategy in the case, from whether to insist on a speedy trial to whether the man held as Hadi might plead guilty in exchange for a certain sentence.

Hadi, a former Iraqi Army noncommissioned officer who ran away from his homeland in the 1990s, is accused of commanding irregular forces that killed and maimed U.S. and allied troops during the post-9/11 invasion, of representing al-Qaida at the Taliban's destruction of the Bamiyan Buddas and of other acts as a senior commander. He's believed to be in his 50s.

At one point during Tuesday's session, the maximum-security, expeditionary courtroom at Camp Justice experienced a jolt of a 4.7-magnitude earthquake off the coast of the base in southeast Cuba, prompting a brief recess but causing no discernible damage.

"The military commissions process adjudicates guilt and innocence," the chief prosecutor, Army Brig. Gen. Mark Martins said later, outside court. "If they are found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, they are sentenced, and that punishment is carried out. In the military commissions process those who've had their trials happen, and who've been sentenced, and those sentences have run, have all been repatriated."

He listed several examples: Omar Khadr, who pleaded guilty in 2010 in exchange for certain repatriation to Canada to complete his sentence; Salim Hamdan, who was found guilty of foot soldier violations as Osama bin Laden's driver in 2008, and was repatriated to Yemen in the same year, when his sentence ran out; and Ibrahim al Qosi, who was returned to Sudan in a plea agreement.

"If the implication is that a military commissions process and outcome is meaningless that's just not the way it's worked out," the general said.

The next test of that concept and the first of the Trump administration comes early next year. An Obama-era agreement said confessed terrorist Ahmad al Darbi could be sentenced here later this year and sent to serve the sentence in a prison in his native Saudi Arabia in February _ after Darbi turns government witness in the Hadi and USS Cole bombing trials.

In their arguments, defense and prosecution lawyers acknowledged that at one point the two sides discussed a plea agreement rather than the trial.

Spencer, the prosecutor, said the law permits Hadi to use a petition of habeas corpus to challenge his detention in federal court. The Iraqi had a habeas petition but the case was closed, he said, prompting Hadi to raise his hands in surprise.

Rushforth said after court that Hadi was unaware of the development at the court, which has traditionally deferred the unlawful detention question in the case of Guantanamo captives with active war court prosecutions until after their trials.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.