Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Budget and the Bees
Budget and the Bees
Latrice Perez

8 Common Phrases That Sound Innocent But Void Legal Agreements

Legal Agreements
Image Source: 123rf.com

In the world of legal agreements, every word matters. While we often focus on dense jargon, the most danger can lie in simple, conversational phrases. For instance, seemingly harmless statements during negotiations can backfire. Courts can interpret these phrases in ways you never intended, creating loopholes or waiving your rights. Understanding this is crucial for protecting yourself. Avoiding these phrases helps prevent a costly legal battle over a void legal agreement.

1. “We’ll work out the details later.”

People often use this phrase to build rapport, but it is a legal minefield. A valid contract requires a “meeting of the minds” on all essential terms. Stating that you will work out key details later is an admission that the agreement is incomplete. As a result, a court could rule that no binding contract ever existed. They might find that you left essential terms undetermined, making it a void legal agreement.

2. “This is our standard agreement.”

A representative might use this statement to discourage you from reading the fine print. It implies the terms are non-negotiable and that everyone signs it as-is. However, a court can use this phrase against the party who said it. Specifically, it can argue there was an inequality of bargaining power. While this may not automatically void the contract, it becomes powerful evidence in a dispute over an unfair term.

3. “Just sign it, this is only a formality.”

Describing a binding document as a “formality” is a dangerous misrepresentation. This phrase intentionally downplays the significance of your signature. Your signature is your legal consent to all the document’s terms. If you can prove the other party misled you about the document’s nature, you may have grounds to nullify it. This is especially true if their misrepresentation tricked you into signing, creating a void legal agreement.

4. “I’m sure we can make an exception.”

This verbal promise often directly contradicts the written terms of a contract. In contract law, the “Parol Evidence Rule” generally prevents using oral promises to contradict a final written agreement. So, while a salesperson might promise an exception, the document you sign says otherwise. Ultimately, that friendly verbal promise is almost always unenforceable and creates confusion.

5. “This is effective as of our handshake.”

While some oral contracts are binding, they are notoriously difficult to enforce. This phrase is problematic because most significant agreements must be in writing. In fact, the “Statute of Frauds” requires a written document for deals involving real estate or goods over a certain value. Furthermore, this statement creates ambiguity if you later sign a written contract. This confusion can easily lead to a legal battle over the terms.

6. “We will act in good faith.”

This sounds like a positive statement, but it can create legal problems. Although the law implies a “covenant of good faith and fair dealing” in most contracts, adding this vague phrase creates uncertainty. The issue is that “good faith” is subjective and each party may define it differently. Instead of a clear rule, you are asking a court to interpret a feeling. Therefore, it is better to use specific, measurable standards in your agreement.

7. “Let’s just amend this by email.”

In our digital age, it is tempting to use email for quick contract changes. However, many formal agreements contain a “No Oral Modification” clause. This clause requires any changes to be in a formal, signed writing. An email may not meet this legal standard, especially without electronic signatures. Consequently, relying on an informal email can invalidate the change, meaning the original terms still bind you.

8. “The contract is void; they didn’t do their part.”

This is a common and dangerous legal assumption. One party’s failure to perform—known as a “breach”—does not automatically void a contract. Typically, the non-breaching party has options like suing for damages or terminating the agreement. However, they cannot simply declare it void on their own. In fact, doing so could put you in breach of the contract. This is a critical distinction that prevents you from turning a winning position into a losing one.

Precision in Your Promises

The language of daily life is flexible, but the law demands precision. The casual phrases that smooth conversations can become massive legal roadblocks. Before signing any agreement, read every word carefully. You should also be wary of any verbal assurances not reflected in the written text. When in doubt, consult a legal professional to ensure your agreement is solid and protects your interests.

What other common phrases have you heard that made you nervous about a contract? Let’s discuss in the comments.

Read More:

10 Common Office Phrases That Actually Signal Manipulation

5 Common Situations That Are More Dangerous Than You Think

The post 8 Common Phrases That Sound Innocent But Void Legal Agreements appeared first on Budget and the Bees.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.